Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Air pollution. Panel backs EPA and 'six cities' study.

J Kaiser

    Science (New York, N.Y.)
    |August 19, 2000
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) successfully defended its stringent particulate air pollution standard. An independent review confirmed the scientific data supporting the EPA's (Environmental Protection Agency) decision, bolstering its regulatory authority.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Tooth-bone attachment tissue is produced by cells with a mixture of odontoblastic and osteoblastic features in reptiles.

    Journal of anatomy·2025
    Same author

    Impact of Heatwaves and Declining NO<sub>x</sub> on Nocturnal Monoterpene Oxidation in the Urban Southeastern United States.

    Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR·2024
    Same author

    Treatment adherence to olfactory training: a real-world observational study.

    Rhinology·2023
    Same author

    Predictors of mortality, ICU hospitalization, and extrapulmonary complications in COVID-19 patients.

    Infectious diseases now·2021
    Same author

    Methodology and applications of elemental mapping by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy.

    Analytica chimica acta·2021
    Same author

    Coordinated labio-lingual asymmetries in dental and bone development create a symmetrical acrodont dentition.

    Scientific reports·2020
    Same journal

    Erratum for the Research Article "Detecting supramolecular organic nanoparticles during heat wave".

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Local signals, systemic decline.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    The mechanics of liver regeneration.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Computing in a memory with physics.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Retraction.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Making time.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental science
    • Public health
    • Regulatory policy

    Background:

    • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established a new, stringent standard for particulate air pollution.
    • This standard faced significant opposition and criticism, particularly from industry stakeholders.
    • Key scientific data underpinning the EPA's standard became a focal point of the debate.

    Discussion:

    • A nonpartisan research group conducted an independent reevaluation of the scientific data used by the EPA.
    • The review specifically examined the evidence related to particulate matter and its health impacts.
    • The research group's findings directly addressed the criticisms leveled against the EPA's standard.

    Key Insights:

    • The independent reevaluation validated the scientific basis of the EPA's particulate matter standard.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The research group's findings provide strong support for the agency's regulatory approach.
  • This outcome represents a significant victory for the EPA in defending its environmental regulations.

    • Outlook:

    • The confirmed data strengthens the EPA's position in future regulatory actions and legal challenges.
    • This validation may encourage stricter enforcement of air quality standards nationwide.
    • Further research may focus on long-term impacts and the efficacy of the established standard.