Related Experiment Videos
Evaluation of air trapping at CT: comparison of continuous-versus suspended-expiration CT techniques
O Lucidarme1, P A Grenier, M Cadi
1Department of Radiology, Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. olivier.lucidarme@psl.ap_hop_paris.fr
Purpose:
To compare thin-section computed tomographic (CT) scans obtained during suspended end expiration with helical CT scans obtained during continuous expiration for the assessment of air trapping.
Materials And Methods:
Forty-nine patients with an airway disease were examined with suspended-end-expiration CT after a 6-8-second expiratory maneuver, which was followed with continuous-expiration CT during a 10-second expiratory maneuver. The extent of expiratory air-trapping areas was calculated by two observers by using a semiquantitative grid score. The relative decrease in attenuation in the areas of air trapping was evaluated with a visual continuous-scale score.
Results:
Air trapping was noted in 36 and 35 patients with continuous-expiration CT and with suspended-end-inspiration CT, respectively. The extents of and relative attenuation decreases in air-trapping areas in patients with air-trapping areas on at least one expiratory CT scan increased significantly in scans obtained with continuous-expiration CT compared with those obtained with suspended-end-expiration CT, respectively, with mean extent scores of 0.24 +/- 0.20 (SD) and 0.18 +/- 0.20 (paired t test, P: =.001) respectively, and with mean relative contrast decrease scores of 0.35 +/- 0.23 and 0.27 +/- 0.23 (paired t test, P: =.007), respectively.
Conclusion:
When suspended-end-expiration CT images are ambiguous, complementary continuous-expiration CT can be used to improve the conspicuity and apparent extent of air trapping.