Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Specialty clinics--gain or loss?].

N Bilenko1, L Avnon, F Shimonovich

  • 1Epidemiology Dept., Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba.

Harefuah
|September 9, 2000
PubMed
Summary

This study looked at the value of first visits to a pulmonary clinic by analyzing 287 new referrals from primary care providers. The researchers found that 30% of patients had their diagnosis changed, and 40% had their treatment plans altered during the first visit. These figures are considered minimal because some patients needed further investigation. The authors suggest that limiting referrals to specialty clinics may save money in the short term but could lead to higher costs and lower quality of care over time. They recommend strengthening the relationship between primary care doctors and specialists to maintain care quality while managing expenses.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Like mother like daughter: low birth weight and preeclampsia tend to reoccur at the next generation.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians·2017
Same author

Socioeconomic status and vaccine coverage during wild-type poliovirus emergence in Israel.

Epidemiology and infection·2016
Same author

Fast and specific dermatophyte detection by automated DNA extraction and real-time PCR.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2013
Same author

Maternal weight misperceptions and smoking are associated with overweight and obesity in low SES preschoolers.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2011
Same author

Housekeeping health care workers have the highest risk for tuberculin skin test conversion.

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2011
Same author

Alarming spread of vancomycin resistant enterococci in Sweden since 2007.

Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin·2010

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonary medicine
  • Primary care outcomes research

Background:

Understanding the role of specialty clinics in healthcare remains a challenge. Prior research has shown that specialty care can influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment plans. However, the extent of these effects in pulmonary medicine is less clear. Some studies suggest that referrals to specialists may not always lead to improved outcomes. This gap motivated an investigation into the value of initial specialty visits. The question of whether such visits add or subtract from overall care remains open. No prior work had resolved the balance between cost and quality in this context. This study aimed to clarify the impact of pulmonary clinic referrals. The findings could help inform healthcare policy decisions.

Purpose Of The Study:

The goal was to assess the diagnostic and treatment impact of first visits to a pulmonary clinic. Researchers examined records of 287 new referrals from primary care providers. The timeframe covered September 1998 to February 1999. The aim was to determine whether these visits led to changes in diagnosis or treatment. The study focused on the initial evaluation phase. The motivation was to address concerns about the cost-effectiveness of specialty care. Recent trends have pushed for fewer referrals to specialty clinics. This study sought to evaluate the potential consequences of such policies.

Keywords:
pulmonary medicinespecialty clinic impactprimary care qualityhealthcare referral policy

Frequently Asked Questions

The diagnosis was changed in 30% of patients during the first visit.

Researchers compared initial provider assessments with those from the specialist after the first visit.

Because some patients required further investigation and follow-up after the first visit.

Follow-up investigations continued after the first visit, as the full diagnostic process was not always complete.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study used a retrospective chart review approach. Researchers analyzed records from 287 new referrals to a pulmonary clinic. The time period included September 1998 through February 1999. Data were collected on changes in diagnosis and treatment. The focus was on the first visit to the clinic. The researchers compared initial provider assessments with those from the specialist. No new diagnostic tests were conducted as part of the study. The evaluation relied on existing clinical records and follow-up data.

Main Results:

At the first visit, the diagnosis was changed in 30% of cases. Treatment plans were altered in 40% of the referrals. These figures represent the minimum impact of the specialty evaluation. In some cases, the full diagnostic process had not yet been completed. Follow-up investigations continued after the initial visit. The changes suggest a significant role for specialty input. The findings highlight the potential value of early specialist involvement. These results challenge assumptions about the necessity of limiting referrals.

Conclusions:

The study suggests that initial visits to a pulmonary clinic can lead to important diagnostic and treatment changes. The researchers propose that these changes may improve patient outcomes. They argue that limiting referrals could reduce short-term costs. However, they warn that this may lead to higher expenses in the long term. The findings support the need for collaboration between primary and specialty care. The authors suggest that such collaboration could help maintain quality while managing costs. They emphasize the importance of considering the full impact of referral policies. These conclusions are based on the observed changes in diagnosis and treatment.

They warn that limiting referrals could increase long-term expenses and reduce quality of care.

They propose maximizing collaboration between primary care physicians and specialists.