[Significance of unresolved financial compensation for the course of cervical root compression]

The aim of this study was to examine the influence of claims for financial compensation on the results of physiotherapeutic McKenzie treatment for cervical nerve root compression. This study was based on prospectively collected data for quality assurance purpose with baseline classification and included a follow-up postal questionnaire to measure the outcomes: Neck and arm pain, disability, use of analgesics and the perceived effect of the treatment registered by the patient. At baseline, patients with or without compensation issues were identical in regard to their neurological and clinical signs. The study showed that 6-12 months later there was no improvement in six out of seven patients with claims for compensation involvement, in contrast to the 21 patients without claims for financial compensation who all showed significant improvement. The results applied to all five outcome measures. In conclusion, compensation involvement seems to act as a negative factor on treatment results for patients with cervical nerve root compression who were treated conservatively.