Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Average-risk screening: is public policy compatible with individual needs?

B Levin1, S T Hawley

  • 1Division of Cancer Prevention, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
|September 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ovarian function suppression decision-making and uptake in premenopausal women with breast cancer: a mixed methods analysis.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2026
Same author

Antechodynamics and Antechokinetics: Dynamics and Kinetics of Antibiotic Resistance Biomolecules.

Biomolecules·2025
Same author

Simultaneous cochlear implantation and removal of acoustic neuroma: implications for hearing.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2020
Same author

Prenatal fever and autism risk.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Smoking, alcohol and caffeine in relation to two hormonal indicators of ovarian age during the reproductive years.

Maturitas·2016
Same author

Macrochimerism in Intestinal Transplantation: Association With Lower Rejection Rates and Multivisceral Transplants, Without GVHD.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2015
Same journal

Small Incisions, Big Impact-Robotic Surgery Is Revolutionizing Cancer Care.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery for Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

TeleSurgery: The Present and the Future for Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive/Robotic Surgery for Colon Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Liver Transplantation.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Population screening for colorectal cancer aims to detect early disease and reduce mortality. This article evaluates current public policy effectiveness in achieving these colorectal cancer screening goals.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Public Health Policy
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Population-based screening for colorectal cancer is a debated topic in medical literature.
  • Screening aims to identify early-stage colorectal cancer in average-risk individuals.
  • Effective public policy is crucial for facilitating timely treatment and reducing mortality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the adequacy of current public policy for colorectal cancer mortality reduction.
  • To assess the effectiveness of population-based screening strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on colorectal cancer screening appropriateness.
  • Analysis of public policy goals and outcomes related to screening.
  • Evaluation of current policies' impact on colorectal cancer mortality.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The debate on colorectal cancer screening appropriateness highlights policy challenges.
  • Current public policies' adequacy in reducing colorectal cancer mortality requires critical assessment.
  • Facilitating early detection through screening is a key policy objective.

Conclusions:

  • The effectiveness of current public policies in reducing colorectal cancer mortality needs further examination.
  • Optimizing public policy is essential for maximizing the benefits of colorectal cancer screening.
  • Ensuring timely treatment through effective screening programs remains a primary goal.