Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Component processes in task switching.

N Meiran1, Z Chorev, A Sapir

  • 1Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. nmeiran@bgumail.bgu.ac.il

Cognitive Psychology
|October 18, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Right anterior cerebellum BOLD responses reflect age related changes in Simon task sequential effects.

Neuropsychologia·2017
Same author

Long trial durations normalise the interference effect and sequential updating during healthy aging.

Acta psychologica·2014
Same author

Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a beta-1 adrenergic receptor-based assay for monitoring the drug atenolol.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2012
Same author

Attentional asymmetry in schizophrenia: disengagement and inhibition of return deficits.

Neuropsychology·2001
Same author

Old age is associated with a pattern of relatively intact and relatively impaired task-set switching abilities.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2001
Same author

Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.

Psychological research·2000
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

Task switching costs decrease with active preparation, but a residual cost remains. This suggests task switching involves passive dissipation, active preparation, and a lingering component.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Task switching involves cognitive control and executive functions.
  • Understanding task-switching costs is crucial for optimizing performance in dynamic environments.
  • Previous research has explored factors influencing task-switching efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the components of task-switching cost.
  • To differentiate between passive and active preparation effects on task switching.
  • To determine if task-switching preparation is a byproduct of general alertness.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed two choice reaction-time (RT) tasks with varying cue-target intervals.
  • Task order was randomized, and an instructional cue indicated the upcoming task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on reaction times and error rates to quantify switching costs.

    • Main Results:

    • Task-switching cost passively dissipated during the response-cue interval.
    • Active preparation during the cue-target interval significantly reduced, but did not eliminate, switching cost.
    • Preparation effects were independent of phasic alertness or target onset prediction.

    Conclusions:

    • Task-switching cost comprises at least three components: passive dissipation, active preparation, and a residual factor.
    • Active preparation plays a significant role in mitigating task-switching costs.
    • The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of cognitive flexibility and executive control.