Visual performance following photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy: a prospective long-term study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2026
Scleral Cross-linking Using Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Radiation for Prevention of Axial Myopia in a Rabbit Model
Published on: April 3, 2016
1Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Purpose:
To prospectively determine the long-term effect of excimer laser photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) on visual performance using psychophysical assessments and to identify predictors of poor performance on the psychophysical assessments.
Setting:
University-based hospital, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Methods:
Ninety-three eyes of 56 patients with a mean of -4.98 diopters +/- 1. 80 (SD) of primary compound myopic astigmatism had PARK using the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser and an erodible mask system. Patients were prospectively evaluated 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months following the procedure. Primary outcome variables included changes in the contrast sensitivity function curve (3.0, 6.0, 12.0, 18.0 cycles per degree) under 2 standard illuminance conditions (scotopic and photopic) and changes in the best spectacle-corrected visual performance under scotopic, photopic, and glare conditions.
Results:
A relative decline in the contrast sensitivity function curve occurred in the early postoperative period under both scotopic and photopic conditions. This was most pronounced under photopic illuminance and at the low spatial frequencies at the 6 month visit. By 1 year, however, the mean contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies and all illuminance conditions had returned to the preoperative level. Further improvements beyond the preoperative level may be related to the independent analysis of retreatment eyes beyond 6 months. A higher level of attempted correction of the spherical equivalent was predictive of an elevated scotopic contrast threshold at the extreme spatial frequencies 6 months after PARK (P <.05). The attempted level of astigmatic correction was predictive of a poor best corrected visual performance under scotopic conditions at 1 month (P <.05). This effect was only temporary and by postoperative month 3, there was no predictive effect of preoperative astigmatism (P >.05).
Conclusions:
Psychophysical assessments may be a more sensitive indicator of decreases in visual performance following excimer laser refractive surgery. The attempted level of correction of spherical equivalent and astigmatism may adversely affect early scotopic visual performance. Decreases in visual performance are temporary, return to normal by 12 months, and remain stable 24 months following PARK.
