Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiological changes five years after unicompartmental knee replacement.

A E Weale1, D W Murray, J Baines

  • 1Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, UK.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume
|October 21, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Knee arthroplasty compared with joint distraction for osteoarthritis: a phase III randomized controlled trial.

Bone & joint open·2025
Same author

Invited review: Contribution of milk harvesting research to optimal interaction between biology and milking technology.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

The outcomes of acute periprosthetic joint infection following unicompartmental knee replacement managed with early debridement, Antibiotics, and implant retention.

The Knee·2024
Same author

High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac.

Physical and engineering sciences in medicine·2023
Same author

No exponential rise in revision knee replacement surgery over the past 15 years: an analysis from the National Joint Registry.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2022
Same author

Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement using radiostereometric analysis.

The Knee·2021
Same journal

Comorbidities in Perthes' disease: a case control study using the General Practice Research database.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012
Same journal

The treatment of complex tibial shaft fractures by the Ilizarov method.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012
Same journal

Posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does a bilateral or unilateral screw technique affect surgical outcome?

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012
Same journal

Anterior deltoid deficiency in reverse total shoulder replacement: a biomechanical study with cadavers.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012
Same journal

Long-term results of dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis for the treatment of chronic scapholunate instability.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012
Same journal

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar instability in patients with hypermobility: a case control study.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012
See all related articles

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) shows a low incidence of progressive osteoarthritis. Careful patient selection and avoiding overcorrection are crucial for successful outcomes in UKR surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) failure can stem from osteoarthritis progression or prosthesis issues.
  • Limb alignment is a critical factor influencing both osteoarthritis and prosthesis longevity.
  • Understanding the long-term effects on adjacent knee compartments and overall leg alignment post-UKR is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the progression of osteoarthritis in other knee compartments after UKR.
  • To measure changes in leg alignment following UKR.
  • To assess the relationship between limb alignment and outcomes after UKR.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 50 UKRs in 45 patients (1989-1992) with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Radiographic assessment (long-leg weight-bearing AP and skyline views) at baseline, 8 months, and 5 years.
  • Blind, randomized review of radiographs to measure osteoarthritis progression and alignment changes, avoiding overcorrection.

    • Main Results:

    • Low incidence of osteoarthritis progression in the patellofemoral joint (1 case) and no deterioration in the opposite tibiofemoral compartment.
    • Recurrence of varus deformity (2 degrees) observed between 8 months and 5 years post-operation.
    • No correlation found between postoperative tibiofemoral angle and recurrent varus at 5 years.

    Conclusions:

    • Careful patient selection and avoiding overcorrection are vital for successful UKR.
    • UKR demonstrates a very low incidence of progressive osteoarthritis in remaining compartments.
    • Observed alignment changes may indicate minor polyethylene wear or tibial component subsidence.