Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Injectable biodegradable materials for orthopedic tissue engineering.

J S Temenoff1, A G Mikos

  • 1Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005-1892, USA.

Biomaterials
|October 31, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advances in biomaterials for skeletal muscle engineering and obstacles still to overcome.

Materials today. Bio·2020
Same author

Modular, tissue-specific, and biodegradable hydrogel cross-linkers for tissue engineering.

Science advances·2019
Same author

Localized SDF-1α Delivery Increases Pro-Healing Bone Marrow-Derived Cells in the Supraspinatus Muscle Following Severe Rotator Cuff Injury.

Regenerative engineering and translational medicine·2018
Same author

Immunosuppressed Adult Zebrafish Model of Mucormycosis.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2018
Same author

Quantitative analysis of immune cell subset infiltration of supraspinatus muscle after severe rotator cuff injury.

Regenerative engineering and translational medicine·2017
Same author

Injectable dual-gelling cell-laden composite hydrogels for bone tissue engineering.

Biomaterials·2016
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Enhanced fluorescence imaging guided photodynamic therapy of sinoporphyrin sodium loaded graphene oxide" [Biomaterials 42 (2015) 16442].

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

An injectable Ce-MnCo LDH nanozyme gel with cascade catalytic activity for acute radiation proctitis in rats.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Peptide coacervate-mediated siRNA delivery for dual PD-1/PD-L1 blockade to enhance colorectal cancer immunotherapy.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

A sonosensitizing hydrogel with tumour-confined stability for intrinsically targeted sonodynamic therapy.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Multidimensional intestinal barrier repair strategies for alleviating inflammatory bowel disease and gut-liver axis-associated metabolic liver disease.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

A dual-twisted molecular strategy achieves dramatic quantum-yield enhancement in NIR-II AIEgen for high-performance bioimaging.

Biomaterials·2026
See all related articles

Injectable biodegradable materials are crucial for bone and cartilage regeneration in orthopedic procedures. This review compares various materials, highlighting their properties and suitability for minimally invasive treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Orthopedic procedures, including arthroscopic surgeries, are increasingly common.
  • There is a growing need for injectable biodegradable materials for bone and cartilage regeneration.
  • Current materials include ceramics, natural substances, and synthetic polymers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare injectable biodegradable materials for orthopedic applications.
  • To evaluate materials based on mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and regeneration efficacy.
  • To provide design criteria for injectable biodegradable systems.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing studies on injectable biodegradable materials.
  • Comparative analysis of material properties: mechanical, biocompatibility, and regenerative.
Keywords:
Non-programmatic

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of advantages and disadvantages for each material type.

    • Main Results:

    • Various materials like ceramics, natural substances, and synthetic polymers show promise.
    • These materials exhibit good biocompatibility, mechanical strength, and tissue regeneration potential.
    • Each material class presents unique advantages and disadvantages for specific applications.

    Conclusions:

    • Injectable biodegradable materials are vital for advancing minimally invasive orthopedic procedures.
    • Material selection depends on balancing mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and regenerative capacity.
    • Further research into optimized material design is essential for enhanced clinical outcomes.