Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modified radical mastectomy.

E F Scanlon, J A Caprini

    Cancer
    |March 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This modified radical mastectomy technique offers excellent axillary exposure and superior cosmetic results compared to standard procedures. It ensures comparable lymph node recovery while minimizing neurovascular injury risk.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Venous Ulcers.

    The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists·2015
    Same author

    Commentary on 'Adjustable Velcro Compression Devices are More Effective than Inelastic Bandages in Reducing Venous Edema in the Initial Treatment Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial'.

    European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2015
    Same author

    Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism--International Consensus Statement.

    International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology·2014
    Same author

    Can combined (mechanical and pharmacological) modalities prevent fatal VTE?

    International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology·2011
    Same author

    Critical issues in deep vein thrombosis prevention.

    Journal of vascular surgery·2010
    Same author

    Dabigatran versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty: a pooled analysis of three trials.

    Thrombosis research·2010
    Same journal

    Toward exercise as standard care for older cancer survivors.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Maintenance therapy in gynecologic malignancies: Current and future state.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Long-term outcomes of evolving treatment regimens in Ewing sarcoma survivors diagnosed 1970-1999: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Large-scale osteosarcoma sequencing reveals age-associated genomic architectures.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat voluntarily withdrawn from market.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Nivolumab and chemotherapy combination approved for previously untreated Hodgkin lymphoma.

    Cancer·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Surgical Oncology
    • Breast Surgery

    Background:

    • Standard radical mastectomy techniques can pose risks to neurovascular structures.
    • Optimizing axillary exposure while preserving function is crucial in breast cancer surgery.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate a modified radical mastectomy technique focusing on pectoralis muscle manipulation.
    • To assess the efficacy, safety, and cosmetic outcomes of this surgical approach.

    Main Methods:

    • Modified radical mastectomy involving pectoralis major and minor muscle maneuvers.
    • Surgical procedure performed on 20 patients.
    • Comparison of lymph node recovery with 223 historical radical mastectomy specimens.

    Main Results:

    • Excellent axillary exposure achieved with minimized risk of traction injury.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Lymph node recovery was comparable to standard radical mastectomy.
  • Superior cosmetic outcomes were observed compared to the standard procedure.
  • Conclusions:

    • This modified radical mastectomy technique provides excellent results and should be considered.
    • The approach is recommended unless disease proximity compromises surgical margins.