Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews.

R Rosenthal1, M R DiMatteo

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, USA.

Annual Review of Psychology
|January 10, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lessons learnt from the construction and implementation of a prospective ventral hernia database.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2024
Same author

Inter-Rater Agreement of the Classification of Intraoperative Adverse Events (ClassIntra) in Abdominal Surgery.

Annals of surgery·2021
Same author

Unintended on-target chromosomal instability following CRISPR/Cas9 single gene targeting.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2020
Same author

Systematic review and simulation study of ignoring clustered data in surgical trials.

The British journal of surgery·2018
Same author

Differential binding affinity of mutated peptides for MHC class I is a predictor of survival in advanced lung cancer and melanoma.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2018
Same author

Perspective: APOBEC mutagenesis in drug resistance and immune escape in HIV and cancer evolution.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2018
Same journal

Implicit Bias: Evolution of a Powerful Idea.

Annual review of psychology·2026
Same journal

Introduction.

Annual review of psychology·2026
Same journal

Social Robotics Is Not (Just) About Machines, It Is About People: Psychology's Role in Developing Social Machines.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Intensive Longitudinal Methods: Toward a Psychological Science of Daily Life.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Human Rationality.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Space to Act, Think, and Create.

Annual review of psychology·2025
See all related articles

Meta-analysis synthesizes research by examining effect sizes, offering a comprehensive view of a field. This quantitative approach addresses criticisms by clarifying procedures and highlighting the importance of effect size estimation and heterogeneity.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Meta-analysis is a statistical technique for combining results from independent studies.
  • Historical criticisms of meta-analysis often stem from misunderstandings of its methodology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the history and current status of the meta-analytic enterprise.
  • To outline the advantages and address criticisms of meta-analysis.
  • To explain the role of effect sizes in meta-analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Description of the basic steps involved in conducting a meta-analysis.
  • Explanation of effect size estimation and its importance.
  • Discussion of heterogeneity assessment in meta-analysis.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Meta-analysis provides a broad "landscape" of a research domain.
  • It helps keep statistical significance in perspective and minimizes wasted data.
  • Key advantages include asking focused research questions and identifying moderator variables.

Conclusions:

  • Many criticisms of meta-analysis are based on misunderstandings and apply equally to traditional reviews.
  • Understanding effect size estimation, heterogeneity, and practical importance is crucial for effective meta-analysis.
  • Meta-analysis is a valuable tool for synthesizing scientific literature.