Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The future of physician profiling.

L G Sandy1

  • 1Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Physician profiling shows limited success for complex interventions, despite growing demand. Future effectiveness hinges on addressing data interpretation challenges and focusing on the human element in quality improvement.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unreliability of physician "report cards" to assess cost and quality of care.

JAMA·2000
Same author

Advance medical planning.

The New England journal of medicine·1997
Same author

Managed care and chronic care: challenges and opportunities.

Managed care quarterly·1997
Same author

Grants to shape the health care workforce: the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation experience.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·1996
Same author

Residency positions revisited.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·1996
Same author

Challenges to generalism: views from the delivery system.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1995

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Medical Informatics
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Physician profiling has a long history in medicine but a mixed record of success.
  • Healthcare organizations are increasingly complex, with overlapping profiling initiatives becoming common.
  • Technological advancements in data analysis are emerging, but privacy concerns persist.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the historical track record and future trends of physician profiling as a healthcare intervention.
  • To identify factors influencing the acceptance, usefulness, and impact of physician profiling.
  • To explore the challenges and opportunities for physician profiling in quality improvement.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical data and trends in physician profiling.
  • Analysis of technological, social, political, and regulatory influences on profiling.
  • Examination of statistical, cognitive, and epistemological challenges in data interpretation.

Main Results:

  • Physician profiling is most effective for simple interventions and processes.
  • Future profiling will likely focus on key processes rather than outcomes.
  • Data interpretation for complex profiling remains a significant challenge.
  • Information brokers may increase complexity and simplification of profiling.

Conclusions:

  • Physician profiling's effectiveness is limited, particularly for complex interventions.
  • Addressing data interpretation and privacy concerns is crucial for future profiling.
  • Integrating the human element into profiling strategies will enhance its impact on quality improvement.

Related Experiment Videos