Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Oncology business update.

P J Goldsmith1

  • 1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA. goldsmip@moffitt.usf.edu

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metastasis of colorectal adenocarcinoma to the thyroid: a case report and review of the literature.

Case reports in surgery·2012
Same author

Extreme achalasia presenting as anorexia nervosa.

Case reports in surgery·2012
Same author

Synchronous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: comparative views of colorectal and liver surgeons.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2012
Same author

Comparable outcomes in donation after cardiac death and donation after brainstem death: a matched analysis of renal transplants.

Transplantation proceedings·2010
Same author

Predicting donor asystole following withdrawal of treatment in donation after cardiac death.

Transplantation proceedings·2010
Same author

Impact of cold ischemia on renal transplant outcomes following donation after cardiac death.

Transplantation proceedings·2010
Same journal

Emerging T-Cell Engagers and Novel Immunotargets in Multiple Myeloma.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Access to Care and the Affordable Care Act: Why Do Problems Exist 15 Years Later?

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Cancers: A Case Study and Literature Review.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Perceived Social Support, Anxiety, and Depression Among Women With Breast Cancer.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Before Certainty.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma and Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive DLBCL: A Rare Concomitant Association.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Environmental factors significantly impact oncology care delivery. Changes in managed care, technology, and payment models are reshaping how cancer services are accessed and provided.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Health Services Research
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • The delivery of oncology care is influenced by a complex interplay of environmental factors.
  • Managed care, regulatory interventions, and technological advancements are key drivers of change.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore environmental factors affecting oncology care delivery in academic and community settings.
  • To analyze the impact of managed care evolution, payment models, and technological integration on cancer services.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature and industry trends in oncology care.
  • Analysis of changes in managed care organizations, physician/hospital compensation, and payer interests.
  • Examination of alternative payment models like case rates and capitation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of insurer coverage for clinical trials and disease management programs.

    • Main Results:

    • Fragmentation and backlash against managed care are significant challenges.
    • Increased federal/state intervention and rapid technological adoption are reshaping care.
    • Consolidation of managed care organizations continues, altering provider-payer dynamics.
    • Shift towards alternative payment models and payer interest in specialized oncology services are evident.

    Conclusions:

    • Oncology care delivery is undergoing substantial transformation due to environmental pressures.
    • Adaptation to evolving managed care landscapes, payment reforms, and technological integration is crucial.
    • Strategic management of oncology services and delivery mechanisms is essential for providers and payers.