Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Combined DNA-RNA Fluorescent In situ Hybridization (FISH) to Study X Chromosome Inactivation in Differentiated Female Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
Published on: June 14, 2014
Did genomic imprinting and X chromosome inactivation arise from stochastic expression?
R Ohlsson1, A Paldi, J A Graves
1Dept of Genetics and Development, Evolution Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18A, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. Rolf.Ohlsson@ebc.uu.se
Abstract:
Both X chromosome inactivation and autosomal genomic imprinting generate a functional hemizygosity. Here we consider models that explain the evolution of genomic imprinting and X chromosome inactivation from novel perspectives. Specifically, we suggest that random (in)activation events are common in genes and gene clusters with a low probability of transcription. These generate variability that natural selection has acted on to evolve stable monoallelic expression. Possible selection forces might include a need for dosage compensation and the prevention of biallelic silencing where a total switch off would be lethal. Two different mechanisms can accomplish regular monoallelic expression - genomic imprinting and gene counting.
More Related Videos
12:42Quick Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Protocol for Xist RNA Combined with Immunofluorescence of Histone Modification in X-chromosome Inactivation
Published on: November 26, 2014
08:27A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome
Published on: May 22, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Epigenetic Regulation
X-Inactivation
Inheritance of Chromatin Structures
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
X-inactivation
Epigenetic Regulation
X-chromosome...