Dysrhythmia hazard after hospitalization for myocardial infarction: two ECG prognostic methods compared

We retrieved reports of heart rate variability and signal-averaged electrocardiograms (SAECG) used to predict risk of a dysrhythmic event. From each report the number of cases with and without events was extracted to establish accurate values for true positive rate (tpr = sensitivity) and false positive rate (fpr = 1 minus specificity). For all the heart rate variability reports, these values were collected and tpr values were plotted versus fpr. The (fpr,tpr) data were summarized by a meta ROC graph using the method of Moses and Shapiro. A composite weighted mean value and 95% confidence interval were also derived. A summary meta-ROC curve for the SAECG reports was similarly obtained., Meta-ROC analysis of multiple reports better summarizes the performances of different prognostic methods and allows the effect of combining tests for a larger population to be simulated.