Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laser evoked potentials using the Nd:YAG laser.

J P Lefaucheur1, S Debray, G Jarry

  • 1Service de Physiologie, Explorations Fonctionnelles, CHU Hopital Henri Mondor, 51 Avenue de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Creteil, France. jean-pascal.lefaucheur@hmn.ap-hop-paris.fr

Muscle & Nerve
|March 27, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A questionnaire to collect unintended effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation: A consensus based approach.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2022
Same author

[The new Parkinson's disease pain classification system (PD-PCS)].

Der Nervenarzt·2022
Same author

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain: Systematic review and French recommendations.

Revue neurologique·2020
Same author

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and subjective tinnitus. A review of the literature, 2014-2016.

European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases·2017
Same author

Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2017
Same author

Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2015
Same journal

Fat-Fraction Quantification Using Three-Point Dixon Technique in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Its Correlation With Clinical Progression and Genotypic Characteristics: A Single Centre One-Year Prospective Study.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Characterizing Combined Central and Peripheral Demyelination-Insights From a Multimodal Comparison With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy and Multiple Sclerosis.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Electrical Modalities in the Rehabilitation of Peripheral Nerve Injuries: State of the Literature and Current Clinical Applications.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Reply to "Sural/Radial Amplitude Ratio in Non-Length-Dependent Neuropathy (NLDN): A Call for More Standardized Methodology and Further Evaluation of Distal NLDN".

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Late-Onset Myasthenia Gravis: An Increasingly Frequent Clinical Entity With Distinctive Challenges.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Management of Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Muscle & nerve·2026
See all related articles

This study shows that nanosecond laser pulses can reliably evoke pain sensations and laser evoked potentials (LEPs) without skin damage. LEP amplitude correlates with perceived pain intensity, not laser energy.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biophysics
  • Laser Technology

Background:

  • Laser Evoked Potentials (LEPs) are crucial for studying pain pathways.
  • Traditional LEP studies use millisecond-duration lasers, limiting certain research avenues.
  • Investigating novel laser parameters is essential for advancing pain research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the efficacy of nanosecond-duration laser pulses in evoking pain and LEPs.
  • To characterize the relationship between laser parameters, pain perception, and LEP characteristics.
  • To compare nanosecond laser stimulation with conventional millisecond lasers in LEP generation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser delivering 5-ns pulses for skin stimulation on the face and limbs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Determined the energy density threshold for inducing pain and LEPs without visible skin damage.
  • Measured LEP amplitude and calculated afferent fiber conduction velocity.
  • Correlated LEP amplitude with subjective pain ratings and laser energy density.

    • Main Results:

    • Nanosecond laser pulses successfully induced pinprick pain sensations and reproducible LEPs at energy densities below 18 mJ/mm(2).
    • Pain threshold and LEP induction were achieved around 10 mJ/mm(2).
    • Afferent fiber conduction velocity was approximately 20 m/s, indicating Adelta fiber activation.
    • LEP amplitude showed a stronger correlation with perceived pain intensity than with energy density.

    Conclusions:

    • Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers with nanosecond pulse durations are effective tools for evoking pain and LEPs.
    • This technique allows for reproducible pain signaling and LEP generation without inducing skin lesions.
    • The findings suggest that nanosecond lasers offer a novel approach for investigating pain neurophysiology and Adelta fiber function.