Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants.

M A Svirsky1, A M Robbins, K I Kirk

  • 1Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 702 Barnhill Dr., RR-044, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5200, USA. msvirsky@iupui.edu

Psychological Science
|March 29, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cochlear Implant Use by a Child Who Is Deaf and Blind: A Case Study.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Scanning electrochemical microscopy as a novel proximity sensor for atraumatic cochlear implant insertion.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2014
Same author

Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Development of visual attention skills in prelingually deaf children who use cochlear implants.

Ear and hearing·2005
Same author

Behavioral inhibition and clinical outcomes in children with cochlear implants.

The Laryngoscope·2005
Same author

Long-term auditory adaptation to a modified peripheral frequency map.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2004
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Retributive Sentiments Track Both Deterrent and Compensatory Concerns in a Small-Scale Society and a WEIRD Sample.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Cochlear implants significantly enhance English language development in prelingually deaf children, with some achieving skills comparable to hearing peers. This study demonstrates implants facilitate linguistic system development based on auditory input.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric audiology
  • Developmental linguistics
  • Neuroscience of hearing

Background:

  • Profoundly deaf children face challenges in speech perception and language acquisition.
  • Cochlear implants (CIs) are a key intervention, but their impact on developing linguistic systems is debated.
  • Critics question whether CIs enable language development comparable to hearing children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of cochlear implantation on the development of English language skills in prelingually deaf children.
  • To determine if cochlear implants facilitate the establishment of an oral linguistic system.
  • To compare language development rates in implanted children to unimplanted deaf children and normally hearing children.

Main Methods:

  • Longitudinal assessment of English language skills in prelingually deaf children before and after cochlear implantation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical comparison of language development rates between implanted children, unimplanted deaf children, and normally hearing children.
  • Analysis of individual variability in language outcomes within the implanted group.

    • Main Results:

    • Children with cochlear implants showed a significantly higher rate of language development post-implantation compared to unimplanted deaf children (p < .001).
    • The language development trajectory for implanted children was found to be similar to that of normally hearing children.
    • While individual results varied, top-performing implanted children demonstrated development of an oral linguistic system primarily driven by cochlear implant auditory input.

    Conclusions:

    • Cochlear implantation is effective in promoting English language development in prelingually deaf children.
    • The findings support the hypothesis that cochlear implants can facilitate the development of a functional oral linguistic system.
    • Further research into factors influencing individual variability in outcomes is warranted.