Related Experiment Videos
Time lapse between hypothesis and publication in the medical sciences.
The New England Journal of Medicine
|June 12, 1975
Summary
Publication of 103 Mayo Clinic papers revealed research timelines averaging 2-4 years. Most time was spent on research and writing, with 23% of manuscripts co-authored by non-first authors.
Area of Science:
- Medical Research
- Publication Science
Background:
- Understanding the publication process is crucial for academic and medical institutions.
- Analyzing factors influencing research publication timelines can optimize scientific output.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate factors affecting the publication timeline of research articles from Mayo Clinic authors.
- To identify key stages and time allocation within the research publication process.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 103 published papers by Mayo Clinic authors.
- Categorization of papers into basic-science, clinical research, case reports, and literature reviews.
- Examination of time from research initiation to publication and manuscript preparation stages.
Main Results:
- Publication timelines varied: 4 years for basic/clinical research, 3 for reviews, 2 for case reports.
- 75% of the time was dedicated to research and writing; 25% to post-writing processing.
- 23% of papers had significant contributions from non-first authors.
- 10-20% of references cited were self-referential.
- Half of papers underwent revision or rejection, impacting journal handling time.
Conclusions:
- The research and writing phases constitute the majority of the publication timeline.
- Collaborative writing and manuscript revision are common aspects of the publication process.
- Understanding these factors can inform strategies to streamline scientific publication.