Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Eye movements during reading: some current controversies.

M S. Starr1, K Rayner

  • 1University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Dept of Psychology, 01003, Amherst, MA, USA

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|April 5, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does contextual strength modulate the subordinate bias effect? A reply to Kellas and Vu.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2016
Same author

Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Can a temporal processing deficit account for dyslexia?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

The use of pressure therapy to treat hypertrophic scarring.

Journal of wound care·2002
Same journal

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Eye-movement measures reveal cognitive processes during reading. This review discusses controversial topics in reading research, including oculomotor factors, parafoveal information processing, and attentional scope.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Eye-movement measures are crucial for understanding cognitive processes during reading.
  • Significant progress has been made, but several controversial issues remain unresolved in reading research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss three controversial issues in the eye-movement literature of reading.
  • To clarify the interplay between low-level oculomotor factors and high-level cognitive processes.
  • To examine information extraction during reading, specifically from the right of fixation and the scope of processing.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and discussion of existing research findings.
  • Analysis of controversial topics within the eye-movement reading literature.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Theoretical discussion on cognitive and oculomotor influences on reading behavior.
  • Main Results:

    • The article highlights ongoing debates regarding the influence of oculomotor control versus cognitive factors on eye movements during reading.
    • It addresses the extent of information acquired parafoveally (to the right of fixation).
    • It explores whether readers process single words or multiple words simultaneously.

    Conclusions:

    • Resolving these controversies is essential for a comprehensive understanding of the reading process.
    • Further research is needed to differentiate between low-level and high-level influences on reading eye movements.
    • Clarifying parafoveal processing and attentional scope will advance models of reading cognition.