Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

14:32
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Leading beyond the bottom line, Part 4. The questions it has raised
R Schenke1, E Berkowitz, J M Ludden
1American College of Physician Executives, Tampa, Florida, USA. rschenke@acpe.org
Summary
This article addresses leadership in healthcare, emphasizing a moral philosophy beyond financial metrics. It guides leaders to balance responsibilities to patients, community, employees, and finances for ethical healthcare management.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Leadership Studies
- Business Ethics
Background:
- Recent confusion exists regarding the role of healthcare enterprises, leadership, and management.
- A lack of guiding philosophy has led to a loss of focus on the "moral" or "right" aspects of healthcare.
- The "Leading Beyond the Bottom Line" series has garnered significant support from ACPE members.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address member questions regarding the "Leading Beyond the Bottom Line" leadership concept.
- To explore the moral challenges inherent in healthcare leadership.
- To re-establish a philosophical foundation for healthcare management and leadership.
Main Methods:
- Discussion and Q&A format addressing member inquiries.
- Exploration of ethical considerations in healthcare leadership.
- Philosophical analysis of the healthcare enterprise's role.
Main Results:
- Enthusiastic support for the "Leading Beyond the Bottom Line" concept among ACPE members.
- Identification of key questions and provision of author answers regarding leadership.
- Reinforcement of the idea that healthcare is more than a business.
Conclusions:
- A guiding philosophy is essential for healthcare leaders.
- Leaders must acknowledge and balance obligations to customers, community, employees, and financial assets.
- Ethical leadership requires a moral framework that transcends purely financial considerations.
Related Concept Videos
Persuasion Strategies
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
Social Loafing
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Groupthink
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
Ethical Issues
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Equity Theory
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
