Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How do people know?

D Kuhn1

  • 1Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. dk100@columbia.edu

Psychological Science
|April 11, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding how we know (epistemic understanding) develops from childhood through adulthood. Advanced epistemic understanding is crucial for critical thinking and reasoned argumentation, impacting skills like juror decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retraction Note: Alterations in circulating vasoactive substances in the critically ill-a comparison between survivors and non-survivors.

Intensive care medicine·2023
Same author

Retraction Note: Circulating adhesion molecules in the critically ill: A comparison between trauma and sepsis patients.

Intensive care medicine·2023
Same author

Laser-pump/X-ray-probe experiments with electrons ejected from a Cu(111) target: space-charge acceleration.

Journal of synchrotron radiation·2016
Same author

[Laryngeal and larynx-associated reflexes].

HNO·2016
Same author

[Diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in children].

HNO·2016
Same author

Abundant cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactive clonotypes in the CD8(+) T cell receptor alpha repertoire following allogeneic transplantation.

Clinical and experimental immunology·2016
Same journal

A Field Experiment Testing Whether Accountability Reduces Racial Gaps in Performance Evaluations.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Testosterone Affect Cognitive Reflection? Evidence From a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of 1,000 Participants.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Epistemology
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding knowledge acquisition requires examining metacognitive processes.
  • Individual and developmental differences in epistemic criteria have broad implications.
  • Young children struggle to distinguish between evidence and explanation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the developmental progression of epistemic understanding.
  • To explore variations in adult epistemic understanding.
  • To examine the link between epistemic understanding and intellectual performance.

Main Methods:

  • The study likely involved observational and experimental methods to assess reasoning and justification skills.
  • Analysis of how individuals differentiate between evidence and explanation was central.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The research may have included developmental comparisons from childhood to adulthood.

    • Main Results:

    • Epistemic understanding shows developmental progression but with significant adult variation.
    • Few adults fully grasp the interplay of evidence and explanation in arguments.
    • Advanced epistemic understanding correlates with a disposition for reasoned argumentation.

    Conclusions:

    • Epistemic understanding is foundational to intellectual values and skills.
    • Developing sophisticated epistemic understanding is essential for critical thinking.
    • This understanding influences practical applications, such as juror reasoning.