Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Theoretical versus experimental resolution in optical microscopy.

M Kozubek1

  • 1Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. kozubek@fi.muni.cz

Microscopy Research and Technique
|April 13, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Image division technique in pre-acquisition analysis of information content for automated microscopy.

Journal of microscopy·2010
Same author

Information content analysis in automated microscopy imaging using an adaptive autofocus algorithm for multimodal functions.

Journal of microscopy·2009
Same author

Confocal microscopy by aperture correlation.

Optics letters·2009
Same author

Microarray analysis using a limited amount of cells.

Folia biologica·2009
Same author

Combination of mRNA and protein microarray analysis in complex cell profiling.

Neoplasma·2009
Same author

Distinct patterns of histone methylation and acetylation in human interphase nuclei.

Physiological research·2007
Same journal

Deep Learning Based Framework for Detection and Classification of Leukemia Using Microscopic Images.

Microscopy research and technique·2026
Same journal

Externally Controlled In Situ SEM: Multi-Rate Scanning With Signal Regulation and Spatiotemporal Fusion.

Microscopy research and technique·2026
Same journal

In Situ TEM Observation of Phase Transformation Nucleation at the Near-Surface of Synthetic Aragonite.

Microscopy research and technique·2026
Same journal

Morpho-Anatomical and HPTLC Investigations of Lysimachia nummularia L. (Primulaceae) Grown in Switzerland.

Microscopy research and technique·2026
Same journal

Macroscopic, Histological and Ultrastructural Features of the Tongue of the Anatolian Wild Boar (Sus scrofa libycus).

Microscopy research and technique·2026
Same journal

Ultrastructural Insights Into the Reproductive Anatomy and Eggs of Cotton Pink Bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae).

Microscopy research and technique·2026
See all related articles

This study compares experimental and theoretical resolution in fluorescence microscopy. Results show experimental resolution is often worse than theoretical predictions due to object size and specimen properties.

Area of Science:

  • Optical microscopy
  • Fluorescence imaging
  • Electromagnetic diffraction theory

Background:

  • Theoretical resolution limits are often assumed for point objects.
  • Experimental conditions significantly impact imaging performance.
  • Understanding resolution dependence is crucial for accurate fluorescence microscopy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare experimental resolution with theoretical predictions.
  • To investigate factors affecting resolution in fluorescence imaging.
  • To analyze the influence of object size, wavelength, microscopy type, and specimen properties on resolution.

Main Methods:

  • Imaging fluorescent beads (0.1-0.5 µm) and DNA targets (ABL, BCR, CEN6, CEN17).
  • Varying excitation wavelength (520 nm vs. 580 nm).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing wide-field, Nipkow disk confocal, and laser scanning confocal microscopy.
  • Applying median and Gaussian filters for image processing.
  • Assessing specimen influences: embedding medium, coverslip thickness, and depth.

    • Main Results:

    • Experimental resolution is frequently worse than theoretical predictions.
    • Object size significantly affects the deviation between experimental and theoretical resolution.
    • Wavelength, microscopy type, and image processing influence resolution.
    • Specimen properties (embedding medium, coverslip thickness) impact both lateral and axial resolution.

    Conclusions:

    • Real objects deviate from ideal point spread functions, leading to lower experimental resolution.
    • Optimizing experimental parameters and specimen preparation is vital for achieving optimal resolution.
    • Findings are relevant for fluorescence imaging and potentially other optical arrangements.