Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Imaging prostate cancer: current and future applications.

E A el-Gabry1, E J Halpern, S E Strup

  • 1Department of Urology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Leonard.Gomella@mail.tju.edu

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)
|April 17, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Urine Extracellular Vesicle GATA2 mRNA Discriminates Biopsy Result in Men with Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Acute Gouty Knee Arthritis: Ultrasound Findings Compared With Dual-Energy CT Findings.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2018
Same author

Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2016
Same author

Efficacy of post-operative radiation in a prostatectomy cohort adjusted for clinical and genomic risk.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2016
Same author

Targeting cell cycle and hormone receptor pathways in cancer.

Oncogene·2013
Same author

An intelligent control strategy for computer consultation.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
Same journal

Emerging T-Cell Engagers and Novel Immunotargets in Multiple Myeloma.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Access to Care and the Affordable Care Act: Why Do Problems Exist 15 Years Later?

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Cancers: A Case Study and Literature Review.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Perceived Social Support, Anxiety, and Depression Among Women With Breast Cancer.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Before Certainty.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma and Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive DLBCL: A Rare Concomitant Association.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Accurate diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer are crucial for effective treatment. Emerging imaging technologies show promise in improving prostate cancer detection and staging beyond current standard methods.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Prostate adenocarcinoma is a common cancer in men, necessitating precise diagnosis and staging for optimal treatment selection.
  • Current standard imaging techniques like ultrasound, MRI, and CT scans lack sufficient reliability for definitive prostate cancer diagnosis and staging.
  • Distinguishing between organ-confined and advanced prostate cancer is critical for determining appropriate therapeutic strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current status of imaging modalities for prostate cancer diagnosis and staging.
  • To identify and discuss emerging imaging technologies that may enhance the accuracy of prostate cancer detection and staging.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on prostate cancer imaging.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of conventional imaging techniques (transrectal ultrasound, MRI, CT, bone scans, X-ray).
  • Assessment of novel and emerging imaging modalities including Doppler ultrasonography, MR contrast imaging, MRI spectroscopy, and radioimmunoscintigraphy.
  • Main Results:

    • Standard imaging modalities are currently insufficient for reliable prostate cancer diagnosis and staging.
    • Advanced imaging techniques such as Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced MRI, and MRI spectroscopy demonstrate potential for improved detection and staging.
    • Emerging technologies show promise but require further validation and are limited in availability.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a need for improved imaging methods for prostate cancer.
    • Newer imaging modalities offer enhanced capabilities for prostate cancer diagnosis and staging.
    • Further research and validation are necessary to integrate these advanced techniques into clinical practice.