Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026
Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
Published on: June 16, 2022
[Cochlear implantation: relationship between speech development and insertion depth in children]
M Adamczyk1, E Bachor, H Bagus
1Cochlear Implant Centrum Ruhr, Universitäts-Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik Essen.
Insights
Deeper insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays in children does not significantly improve speech development. This study found no statistical difference in speech and hearing scores between shallower and deeper electrode placements.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Audiology
- Speech-Language Pathology
Background:
- Pediatric cochlear implantation aims to enhance hearing and speech development for mainstream schooling.
- The impact of cochlear implant electrode array intracochlear position on speech development remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between cochlear electrode array insertion depth and speech development in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.
Main Methods:
- 29 children received Nucleus cochlear implants (1996-1998).
- Speech and language skills were evaluated using the Mainzer and Schmid-Giovannini tests pre- and post-implantation.
- Electrode array position was determined by surgical records and X-ray, defining deep insertion as >24 intracochlear bands.
Main Results:
- Patients were grouped by insertion depth: Group 1 (≤24 bands) and Group 2 (>24 bands).
- At 12 months post-implantation, mean closed-set test scores were 51.4% (Group 1) and 68.5% (Group 2).
- Mean Schmid-Giovannini scores were 8.7 (Group 1) and 10.1 (Group 2), with no significant statistical difference between groups.
Conclusions:
- Deeper insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array does not lead to improved speech development in children.
- The study found no significant benefit in speech or hearing outcomes with more profound electrode insertion depths.
Background:
The goal in pediatric cochlear implantation is improved hearing leading to better speech development, which may allow their integration into mainstream schools. Whether the intracochlear position of the electrode array has an influence on speech development or not is controversially discussed.
Patients:
Between 1996 and 1998 29 children ranging from 1.5 to 11.8 years (median 4 years) were provided with a Nucleus 22M or 24M cochlear implant system. Speech and language skills were assessed by a closed-set test (Mainzer test) and by the Schmid-Giovannini score for hearing development pre-implantation and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-implantation. The position of the electrode array was determined by the surgical record and by a postoperative transorbital x-ray. Since the promontory has a thickness of one to two electrode bands, we defined deep insertion as more than 24 bands intracochlear.
Results:
The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the insertion depth: Group 1 (n = 8) 24 bands (22 electrodes and 2 stiffening rings correspond to < or = 18 mm) or less and group 2 (n = 21) more than 24 bands intracochlear correspond to > 18 mm). The mean closed-set test scores 12 months post-implantation were 51.4% and 68.5% for group 1 and group 2, respectively. Schmid-Giovannini test scores were 8.7 for group 1 and 10.1 for group 2. There was no significant statistical difference in the closed-set and Schmid-Giovannini test scores. We observed incomplete insertion (i.e. less than 22 active bands are intracochlear) because of electrode extrusion in only one child.
Conclusion:
Speech development in children does not improve with deeper insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array.
More Related Videos
03:58Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
Published on: January 17, 2025
07:34Testing a Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Training System for Optimal Electrode Array Placement in Different Inner Ear Anatomies
Published on: February 6, 2026