Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

E-mail-based oral medicine consultation.

F S Younai1, D V Messadi

  • 1University of California at Los Angeles School of Dentistry, USA.

Journal of the California Dental Association
|April 28, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The AADOCR Position Statement on Topical Fluoride.

Journal of dental research·2025
Same author

Oral Health Literacy, Preventive Behavior Measures, and Chronic Medical Conditions.

JDR clinical and translational research·2019
Same author

The need to educate future dental professionals on E-cigarette effects.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2018
Same author

Elevated prolidase activity in keloids: correlation with type I collagen turnover.

The British journal of dermatology·2006
Same author

Self-reported oral dryness and HIV disease in a national sample of patients receiving medical care.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics·2001
Same author

Occupational exposures to blood in a dental teaching environment: results of a ten-year surveillance study.

Journal of dental education·2001
Same journal

A Joint Initiative to Improve Dental Public Health Communication in Maryland.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2026
Same journal

Among Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Methods, Automated Gradient-Boosting Models Accurately Score Intraoral Plaque in Non-Standardized Images.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2025
Same journal

Dentistry: Our Sustainable Future.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2025
Same journal

Current Understanding of the Regulatory Mechanism of Tooth Root Development and Future Perspectives.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2023
Same journal

Advances in Tissue Engineering and Implications for Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2021
Same journal

Cannabis Use and Oral Health in a National Cohort of Adults.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2021
See all related articles

Electronic patient data transmission via email is not a reliable source for diagnosing oral mucosal conditions. Direct patient examination is more accurate for diagnosis and treatment planning.

Area of Science:

  • Oral Medicine
  • Dental Diagnostics
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Electronic patient data transmission is increasingly used in healthcare.
  • Assessing the reliability of text-based data for clinical decision-making is crucial.
  • Oral mucosal conditions require accurate diagnosis for effective management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability of text-based electronic patient data (email) for diagnosing oral mucosal pathologies.
  • To determine if transmitted patient data alone can guide diagnostic testing and treatment plans.
  • To compare the diagnostic accuracy of transmitted data versus direct patient examination.

Main Methods:

  • A pilot study design was employed.
  • Text-based electronic patient data (email) was transmitted for review.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Diagnostic recommendations were based solely on transmitted data.
  • Findings were compared to diagnoses made through face-to-face patient examinations.

    • Main Results:

    • Transmitted descriptive patient data alone was insufficient for accurate diagnosis of oral mucosal pathologies.
    • Email data led to less accurate diagnostic recommendations compared to direct examination.
    • Face-to-face patient examination proved more reliable for establishing correct diagnoses.

    Conclusions:

    • Text-based electronic patient data transmission (email) is not a reliable sole source for diagnosing oral mucosal conditions.
    • Direct patient examination remains the gold standard for accurate oral pathology diagnosis.
    • Relying solely on transmitted data may compromise diagnostic accuracy and patient care.