Related Experiment Videos
Transesophageal pacemaker therapy in atrial flutter after procainamide pretreatment
1Hospital for Chest Disease of Somogy County, Department of Cardiology, Mosdos, Hungary.
American Journal of Therapeutics
|May 1, 2001
Summary
Procainamide pretreatment is more effective than digoxin for terminating atrial flutter using transesophageal atrial stimulation. This study compared the efficacy of these two drugs in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial flutter.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Atrial flutter is a common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia.
- Transesophageal atrial stimulation is a method for terminating atrial flutter.
- Pharmacological pretreatment may influence the success of electrical cardioversion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of digoxin versus procainamide pretreatment in facilitating transesophageal atrial stimulation for terminating atrial flutter.
Main Methods:
- Fifty-six patients with atrial flutter were randomized into two groups.
- Group A received digoxin pretreatment; Group B received procainamide pretreatment.
- Transesophageal atrial stimulation using a programmable stimulator and esophageal electrode catheters was employed.
Main Results:
- Procainamide pretreatment resulted in a higher success rate for converting atrial flutter to sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation compared to digoxin.
- Specifically, procainamide facilitated cardioversion in 24 out of 26 patients, while digoxin facilitated it in 27 out of 30 patients.
- The difference in efficacy between procainamide and digoxin was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Procainamide is more efficacious than digoxin in facilitating cardioversion of atrial flutter by transesophageal atrial stimulation.
- Pharmacological pretreatment plays a role in the success of non-invasive arrhythmia termination techniques.