Closed commissurotomy versus balloon valvuloplasty for rheumatic mitral stenosis

Closed mitral commissurotomy (CMC) and percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty (PMBV) were compared by their initial results and Doppler echocardiographic data obtained at one week and one year after the procedure.

Of 580 patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis, 280 underwent CMC and 300 PMBV. The mean pre-procedural transmitral gradient (TMG) was 21 +/- 6 mmHg in the CMC group and 20 +/- 5 mmHg in the PMBV group (p = 0.6); the mean mitral valve area (MVA) was 1.1 +/- 0.2 cm2 in both groups.

Mortality was 0.7% after CMC and 0.3% after PMBV; the primary success rates were 98.3% and 89% respectively (p <0.0001). Two CMC patients and three PMBV patients underwent emergency mitral valve replacement. At the first week, the mean TMG was decreased to 4 +/- 3 mmHg in the CMC group, and to 5.8 +/- 2 mmHg in the PMBV group (p <0.0001). The mean MVA was increased to 2.5 +/- 0.5 cm2 after CMC, and to 2.1 +/- 0.4 cm2 after PMBV (p <0.0001). After one year, TMG was 5.4 +/- 4 mmHg in the CMC group (p <0.0001) and 7.1 +/- 3 mmHg in the PMBV group (p <0.0001); MVA was 2.3 +/- 0.5 cm2 (p <0.0001) and 1.9 +/- 0.4 cm2 (p <0.0001), respectively. The results of CMC were significantly better (p <0.0001) with regard to TMG and MVA at these times. A significant decrease was also seen in mean left atrial diameter and pulmonary artery pressure in both groups (p <0.0001).

Although satisfactory results can be achieved using either approach, CMC provides a higher primary success rate, greater MVA augmentation, and better technical control during the procedure, while reducing the cost. PMBV shortens in-hospital stay and eliminates the risk imposed by thoracotomy and anesthesia. Therefore, in our practice, when surgical intervention is contraindicated due to associated problems, PMBV may be the preferred approach, but exposure to radiation may be of concern in pregnant patients.