Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What causes birth order-intelligence patterns? The admixture hypothesis, revived.

J L Rodgers1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, 455 West Lindsey, Room 705, Norman, OK 73019, USA. jrodgers@ou.edu

The American Psychologist
|June 21, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrections For Spurious Influences On Correlations Between Mmpi Scales.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

The Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and the Randomization Test: A Sampling Taxonomy.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Seasonality of birth in nineteenth- and twentieth-century Austria.

Social biology·2002
Same author

DF-analyses of heritability with double-entry twin data: asymptotic standard errors and efficient estimation.

Behavior genetics·2001
Same author

Birth order and intelligence: together again for the last time?

The American psychologist·2001
Same author

Behavior genetic modeling of human fertility: findings from a contemporary Danish Twin Study.

Demography·2001
Same journal

Cumulative adverse childhood experiences and parent-reported allergic conditions and asthma among U.S. children: A nationally representative study.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Natural disaster, social cohesion, and prosociality: A natural experiment.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Practice guidelines regarding psychologists' involvement in pharmacological issues.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

International Competences for Undergraduate Psychology (ICUP): A constructive shift for psychology?

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Two dimensions of access: Availability and affordability of mental health care across the United States.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Revisiting secondary antisemitism: Antisemitism as a cause, not a consequence, of ingroup-serving Holocaust distortions.

The American psychologist·2026
See all related articles

Birth order and intelligence findings differ between cross-sectional and within-family studies. The admixture hypothesis explains these birth order patterns, invalidating previous theories and guiding future research.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Human Development
  • Behavioral Genetics

Background:

  • Previous research on birth order and intelligence yielded inconsistent results.
  • Cross-sectional studies often suggested a link between higher birth order and lower intelligence.
  • Within-family studies, however, did not consistently support these findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reconcile discrepancies in birth order-intelligence research.
  • To evaluate the validity of existing theories (e.g., dilution, confluence model).
  • To propose and support the admixture hypothesis as an explanation for observed patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing empirical data on birth order and intelligence.
  • Comparison of findings from cross-sectional versus within-family study designs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Theoretical evaluation of the admixture hypothesis against empirical evidence.

    • Main Results:

    • Empirical evidence contradicts conclusions from traditional cross-sectional birth order studies.
    • The dilution and confluence models lack empirical support when examined within families.
    • The admixture hypothesis effectively explains the observed patterns in birth order-intelligence research.

    Conclusions:

    • The admixture hypothesis provides a robust explanation for birth order and intelligence findings.
    • Past research relying solely on cross-sectional data is invalidated.
    • Reframing the birth order-intelligence argument is crucial for future research.