Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using two standard cylindrical threaded cages, a single mega-cage, or dual nested...

Our purpose was: (1) to compare the biomechanical properties of an interbody reconstruction using two standard threaded cages (18-mm diameter), a reconstruction using a single mega-cage (24-mm diameter), and a reconstruction using dual nested cages (22-mm diameter); and (2) to quantify the surface area of the cancellous bone bed exposed by reaming for the cages. Each motion segment was tested according to a nondestructive biomechanical loading sequence (compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending, axial torsion). Load was applied first to the intact motion segment and again after the insertion of cages, and stiffness values were calculated at each step. After the testing, each specimen was bisected through the disc and the surface area of the vascular bed was calculated. Comparison of the biomechanical properties of the three reconstructions showed that the dual nested cages produced the stiffest reconstruction. However, when the standard cages were compared with the nested cages, there was no significant difference, and compared with the mega-cage, the only difference was in flexion. The surface area of cancellous bone exposed by reaming for each of the three reconstructions showed the greatest value with the dual nested cages. These findings, together with the improved safety afforded by the nested or mega-cage, suggest that they are appropriate alternatives to the standard dual threaded cage reconstruction.