Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiation hormesis: data and interpretations.

A C Upton1

  • 1Department of Environmental and Community Medicine, UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick 08901-2008, USA. acupton@eohsi.rutgers.edu

Critical Reviews in Toxicology
|August 16, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comments on the article 'Defining hormesis', by EJ Calabrese and LA Baldwin.

Human & experimental toxicology·2002
Same author

Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment.

Cancer·1996
Same author

Lifespan and autopsy findings in the first-generation offspring of X-irradiated male mice.

Mutation research·1993
Same author

Radiation, diagnosis, and management.

Cancer detection and prevention·1991
Same author

Environmental medicine: introduction and overview.

The Medical clinics of North America·1990
Same author

Carcinogenic risk assessment in proper perspective.

Toxicology and industrial health·1988
Same journal

Inhalation exposure and health effects of copper particles in the context of occupational exposure limit derivation.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same journal

Screening for the ovarian toxicity of industrial chemicals - ovarian follicles and corpora lutea counts in rats, an inter- and intra-laboratory comparison.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of the modes of action for key noncancer effects of 1,3-Butadiene: input from an independent expert panel to support derivation of data-derived extrapolation factors.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same journal

The effect of antioxidants on antineoplastic-induced male reproductive system damage: a systematic review of experimental studies.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same journal

Weight-of-evidence assessment of the endocrine-disrupting properties of propylene oxide.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same journal

The formaldehyde dispute - Part A: acute and chronic inhalation toxicity and the evolution of scientific knowledge.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
See all related articles

Low-to-intermediate doses of ionizing radiation can stimulate biological processes, suggesting a biphasic or hormetic dose-response. Further research is needed to confirm if these adaptive responses reduce risks from low-level radiation exposure.

Area of Science:

  • Radiobiology
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • High doses of ionizing radiation are harmful.
  • Low-to-intermediate doses may stimulate biological processes like growth, survival, and immune response.
  • These stimulatory effects are termed adaptive responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the biphasic, or hormetic, nature of radiation dose-response relationships.
  • To explore the implications of adaptive responses for radiation protection.
  • To determine if adaptive responses reduce risks associated with low-level irradiation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on biological effects of ionizing radiation.
  • Analysis of dose-response relationships for genetic and carcinogenic effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of knowledge gaps regarding adaptive responses.

    • Main Results:

    • Observed enhancement of growth, survival, and immune response at low-to-intermediate radiation doses across various organisms.
    • Hypothesized biphasic (hormetic) dose-response for genetic and carcinogenic effects.
    • Inconclusive evidence on the extent to which adaptive responses mitigate low-level radiation risks.

    Conclusions:

    • Adaptive responses to ionizing radiation suggest a potential hormetic effect.
    • Further research is crucial to elucidate dose-response relationships and individual variability.
    • The protective role of adaptive responses against low-level radiation requires definitive investigation.