Related Experiment Videos
Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Brånemark System MKII implants: a prospective comparative study between
M Chiapasco1, S Abati, E Romeo
1Department of Oral Surgery, Dental Clinic, School of Dentistry, University of Milan, Italy. matteo.chiapasco@unimi.it
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|August 23, 2001
Summary
Immediate loading of dental implants for mandibular overdentures showed comparable results to delayed loading. This approach significantly reduces treatment time without negatively impacting osseointegration or patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Prosthodontics
- Oral Surgery
Background:
- Immediate loading protocols for dental implants are increasingly explored.
- Comparing immediate versus delayed loading is crucial for clinical practice.
- Implant-retained mandibular overdentures offer improved patient function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare immediate versus delayed loading of Brånemark System MKII implants for mandibular overdentures.
- To evaluate the effects on osseointegration and peri-implant health.
- To assess treatment duration and patient satisfaction.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 20 patients (10 immediate, 10 delayed loading).
- Placement of 40 implants in the interforaminal mandible, followed by either immediate or delayed prosthetic loading.
- Clinical and radiographic assessments including Plaque Index, Bleeding Index, probing depth, Periotest, and bone resorption over 24 months.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in plaque index, bleeding index, Periotest values, or bone resorption between groups.
- Slight differences in probing depth at mesial and lingual sites at 12 months.
- Cumulative implant success rate of 97.5% in both immediate and delayed loading groups.
Conclusions:
- Immediate loading of implants for mandibular overdentures does not adversely affect osseointegration.
- This protocol offers a significant reduction in treatment duration.
- Immediate loading provides patient satisfaction and comparable clinical outcomes to delayed loading.