Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
Published on: July 30, 2009
Reactions of children to maxillary infiltration and mandibular block injections
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, The Hebrew University Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Insights
Children tolerate both mandibular block and maxillary infiltration anesthesia similarly during dental treatment. While some children may cry, they generally report positive feelings post-injection, indicating good acceptance of dental local anesthesia.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Dentistry
- Pain Management
- Local Anesthesia
Background:
- Assessing children's responses to dental procedures is crucial for effective treatment.
- Understanding pain perception in pediatric patients aids in developing better anesthetic techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate children's reactions to mandibular block and maxillary infiltration anesthesia.
- To compare pain sensation experienced by children after each type of local anesthetic injection.
Main Methods:
- A randomized crossover study involved 60 children (ages 4-10) receiving both anesthetic types.
- Behavioral Pain Scale and Facial Affective Scale assessed reactions during and after injections.
- Modified Behavioral Pain Scale included facial display, limb and torso movements, and crying.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in acceptance between mandibular block and maxillary infiltration anesthesia.
- Objective evaluation showed more positive reactions (e.g., crying) during mandibular block administration.
- Subjective and objective evaluations revealed no difference based on the order of injection administration.
Conclusions:
- Mandibular block and maxillary infiltration are similarly accepted by children upon initial administration.
- Despite potential crying or discomfort, children generally report positive overall feelings post-anesthesia.
- Pediatric dental anesthesia techniques are well-tolerated, with children adapting positively.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to assess children's reactions to the administration of local anesthetic injection in the mandible and in the maxilla, and to study their sensation of pain after each type of injection.
Methods:
Twenty-six children between the ages of 4 to 6 (mean age 5.3+/-0.7 years), and 34 children aged between 7 to 10 (mean age 8.1+/-1.1 years,) who were undergoing dental treatment in a pediatric dental clinic, were selected for this study. A random crossover design was used. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive either maxillary infiltration or mandibular block on the first visit, and the remaining local anesthesia on the second visit. During the injection, the modified Behavioral Pain Scale, was used. It comprised the following parameters: a) facial display, b) arm/leg movements, c) torso movements, and d) crying. Immediately after administering the local anesthesia, children were asked to rate their feeling according to the Facial Affective Scale.
Results:
The children in each group responded positively to both techniques revealing that there was no difference in either one. Subjective and objective evaluation disclosed no difference when mandibular block was administered during the first or second visit. Regarding the objective evaluation, in all parameters, more children reacted positively during administration of mandibular block than during maxillary infiltration.
Conclusion:
a) mandibular block and maxillary infiltration are similarly accepted by children when first administered, and b) children may feel inconvenience or pain and react by crying, yet may report a positive feeling in general.
More Related Videos
08:49Assessing Changes in Volatile General Anesthetic Sensitivity of Mice after Local or Systemic Pharmacological Intervention
Published on: October 16, 2013
06:48Ethanol-Induced Cervical Sympathetic Ganglion Block Applications for Promoting Canine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Regeneration Using an Artificial Nerve
Published on: November 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview