Related Experiment Videos
Cost-effectiveness of a collaborative care program for primary care patients with persistent depression
G E Simon1, W J Katon, M VonKorff
1Center for Health Sudies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington 98101-1148, USA. simon.g@ghc.org
The American Journal of Psychiatry
|October 2, 2001
Summary
Stepped collaborative care for persistent depression significantly increased depression-free days by 16.7 over six months, at an incremental cost of $21.44 per day. This approach offers a cost-effective strategy for improving mental health outcomes in primary care.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Psychiatry
- Public Health
Background:
- Persistent depressive symptoms often require enhanced management beyond usual primary care.
- Effective treatment strategies for depression in primary care settings are crucial for improving patient outcomes.
- Collaborative care models show promise in managing chronic conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of a stepped collaborative care model for patients with persistent depressive symptoms.
- To compare outcomes and costs of collaborative care versus usual care in primary care patients.
- To determine the economic value of enhanced depression management in primary care.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving primary care patients with persistent depressive symptoms.
- Patients were assigned to either usual care or a stepped collaborative care program.
- Clinical outcomes (depression-free days) and healthcare costs were assessed over six months.
Main Results:
- Collaborative care resulted in an average of 16.7 additional depression-free days over six months.
- The incremental cost of the collaborative care program was $357 per patient.
- The incremental cost-effectiveness was $21.44 per depression-free day.
Conclusions:
- Stepped collaborative care significantly improves depression treatment effectiveness in primary care.
- While associated with moderate cost increases, the return on investment is comparable to other accepted medical interventions.
- Investing additional resources in collaborative care models is justified by improved patient outcomes.