Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The controversy over retrospective moral judgment.

Allen Buchanan

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
    |September 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary

    The U.S. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments debated whether to include retrospective moral judgments in its final report. This essay explores the differing viewpoints on judging past actions and their ethical implications.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    On the Ethics of Vaccine Nationalism: The Case for the Fair Priority for Residents Framework.

    Ethics & international affairs·2021
    Same author

    What are the obligations of pharmaceutical companies in a global health emergency?

    Lancet (London, England)·2021
    Same author

    An ethical framework for global vaccine allocation.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2020
    Same author

    PRINCIPAL/AGENT THEORY AND DECISIONMAKING IN HEALTH CARE.

    Bioethics·2017
    Same author

    Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem.

    Journal of medical ethics·2011
    Same author

    Still unconvinced, but still tentative: a reply to DeGrazia.

    Journal of medical ethics·2011

    Area of Science:

    • Ethics
    • History of Science
    • Public Policy

    Background:

    • The U.S. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments was tasked with evaluating past human radiation experiments.
    • A key challenge involved determining the ethical standards applicable to historical events.

    Observation:

    • The committee was divided on the appropriateness of making retrospective moral judgments.
    • Debates centered on whether to assess individual culpability and wrongdoing in the context of historical experiments.

    Findings:

    • This essay analyzes the arguments presented by committee members with opposing views on retrospective moral judgment.
    • It highlights the significance of this internal controversy within the committee's operations.

    Implications:

    Keywords:
    Advisory Committee on Human Radiation ExperimentsAnalytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchCold War

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Understanding this debate provides insight into the complexities of historical ethical evaluations.
    • The controversy underscores the challenges in applying contemporary moral standards to past scientific practices.