Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

The controversy over retrospective moral judgment

Allen Buchanan

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
    |September 1, 1996
    PubMed

    Keywords:
    Advisory Committee on Human Radiation ExperimentsAnalytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchCold War

    More Related Videos

    Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task06:08

    Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

    Published on: July 22, 2025

    Related Concept Videos

    Hindsight Biases01:12

    Hindsight Biases

    Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
    Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

    Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

    Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
    Pre-Conventional Level
    At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
    Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

    Ethical Dilemmas II

    Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
    Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

    Fundamental Attribution Error

    According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
    Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

    Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

    Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
    Motivational Bias01:25

    Motivational Bias

    Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...