Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating causal strength: the role of structural knowledge and processing effort.

M R Waldmann1, Y Hagmayer

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Göttingen, Gosslerstrasse 14, 37073 Göttingen, Germany. michael.waldman@bio.uni-goettingen.de

Cognition
|October 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Understanding causal relationships requires inferring statistical patterns. Prior assumptions about event roles and processing effort significantly influence how we estimate these causal connections.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: evidence from an overshadowing paradigm.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

Determining whether causal order affects cue selection in human contingency learning: comments on Shanks and Lopez (1996)

Memory & cognition·1997
Same author

Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·1992

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Causal Inference
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Causal strength is typically inferred from statistical relations between observable events.
  • Extracting statistical information from events can be approached in multiple ways.
  • The role of a third event in a causal structure impacts assessments of cause-effect relationships.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how prior assumptions about causal roles influence contingency estimation.
  • To examine the impact of processing effort on statistical information processing in causal learning.
  • To explore the interplay of top-down and bottom-up influences in acquiring causal knowledge.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted three experiments presenting identical learning input.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulated prior assumptions about the causal roles of learning events.
  • Measured contingency estimation and analyzed the effect of processing effort.

    • Main Results:

    • Prior assumptions about causal roles significantly altered contingency assessments.
    • Processing effort was identified as another key factor influencing statistical information processing.
    • Identified an interaction between bottom-up (statistical data) and top-down (prior assumptions) influences.

    Conclusions:

    • Abstract assumptions about causal structures, beyond covariation and mechanisms, shape causal learning.
    • Both prior knowledge and cognitive effort play crucial roles in inferring causal relationships.
    • Findings support a dual-process model of causal knowledge acquisition.