Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An algorithm for prospective individual matching in a non-randomized clinical trial.

P A Charpentier1, S T Bogardus, S K Inouye

  • 1Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Peter.charpentier@yale.edu

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|October 25, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a method for balancing prognostic factors in clinical trials without randomization. Prospective matching of patients within existing treatment groups achieves balance, offering a rigorous alternative for non-randomized studies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Protocol for the Electroencephalography Guidance of Anesthesia to Alleviate Geriatric Syndromes (ENGAGES) study: a pragmatic, randomised clinical trial.

BMJ open·2016
Same author

Nano-TiO2/polyurethane composites for antibacterial and self-cleaning coatings.

Nanotechnology·2012
Same author

A thermal study on the structural changes of bimetallic ZrO2-modified TiO2 nanotubes synthesized using supercritical CO2.

Nanotechnology·2009
Same author

Delirium accelerates cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease.

Neurology·2009
Same author

Delirium is associated with early postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

Anaesthesia·2008
Same author

The time and change test: a simple screening test for dementia.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2008

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard but not always feasible.
  • Non-randomized trials often struggle with baseline characteristic imbalance.
  • Achieving balance is crucial for valid causal inference in observational or quasi-experimental studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe and evaluate a method for achieving balance in prognostic factors in non-randomized intervention trials.
  • To provide a rigorous alternative to randomization when it is not possible.
  • To demonstrate the method's applicability and success in a real-world clinical trial.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective individual matching of patients already assigned to treatment groups.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing baseline prognostic indices or composite risk scores as matching factors.
  • Analysis using methods appropriate for prospective matched cohort studies.

    • Main Results:

    • The method successfully matched 95% of eligible intervention patients in the Delirium Prevention Trial.
    • Excellent balance was achieved for both matching and non-matching factors.
    • Using a composite baseline risk score as a matching factor enhanced balance.
    • External validity was improved by enrolling patients as they presented.

    Conclusions:

    • Prospective matching is a methodologically sound approach to balance prognostic factors in non-randomized trials.
    • The method is practical, with successful implementation demonstrated in a clinical setting.
    • This approach has broad applicability in situations where randomization is not feasible, enhancing the reliability of study findings.