Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Ocular counterrolling differs in dynamic and static stimulation.

C H Markham¹, S G Diamond

¹Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA. cmarkham@ucla.edu

Acta Oto-Laryngologica. Supplementum

|October 27, 2001

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Snap-valve cerebral shunt design for intracranial pressure operation and ultrasound visualization.

Medical engineering & physics·2019

Same author

Feasibility of NIRS in the neurointensive care unit: a pilot study in stroke using physiological oscillations.

Neurocritical care·2009

Same author

A temporal comparison of BOLD, ASL, and NIRS hemodynamic responses to motor stimuli in adult humans.

NeuroImage·2005

Same author

Changes in gravitational state cause changes in ocular torsion.

Journal of gravitational physiology : a journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology·2001

Same author

The experience of nausea during sustained hyper-gravity flight with negligible angular velocity.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2001

Same author

New focus for community hospitals: neuro centers.

Health care strategic management·2000

Same journal

Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2013

Same journal

Inner ear drug delivery system from the clinical point of view.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2010

Same journal

Hydrogen protects vestibular hair cells from free radicals.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2010

Same journal

Distribution of bone marrow-derived cells in the vestibular end organs and the endolymphatic sac.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2010

Same journal

Impacts and limitations of medialization thyroplasty on swallowing function of patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2010

Same journal

A tissue-engineering approach for stenosis of the trachea and/or cricoid.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2010

See all related articles

Ocular counterrolling (OCR) differs significantly between static and dynamic testing. Dynamic rotation shows generally conjugate eye movements, while static tilting reveals notable disconjugacy, suggesting independent eye control.

Area of Science:

Vestibular system
Oculomotor control
Neuroscience

Background:

Ocular counterrolling (OCR) studies traditionally used static tilting.
Previous research explored dynamic rotation below semicircular canal thresholds.
This study directly compares OCR in static versus dynamic conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare ocular counterrolling (OCR) between static and dynamic rotational protocols.
To investigate differences in eye movement conjugacy and amplitude.
To explore potential mechanisms underlying observed OCR variations.

Main Methods:

Ten healthy subjects (mean age 50.9 years) participated.
Dynamic rotation involved 90-degree naso-occipital axis turns at 3 degrees/s.

Keywords:

Non-programmatic

Related Experiment Videos

Static tilting involved sustained positions from 30 to 90 degrees.

Main Results:

Significant variations in OCR were observed between static and dynamic modes.
Static tilting induced substantial eye disconjugacy (up to 4 degrees).
Dynamic rotation generally resulted in conjugate OCR, with differing amplitudes between modes.

Conclusions:

OCR responses differ markedly depending on static versus dynamic stimulation.
The findings suggest potential independent control mechanisms for each eye.
Otoconia's interaction with hair cells may explain static disconjugacy, similar to animal models.