Related Experiment Videos
Boerhaave's syndrome: a continuing challenge in thoracic surgery
1Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Hyperbaric Surgery, University School of Medicine, K.F. University Graz, Austria.
Hepato-Gastroenterology
|October 27, 2001
Summary
Boerhaave's syndrome management depends on leak severity. Primary repair for minor leaks showed no mortality, while esophagectomy for severe leaks had 22.2% mortality.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Thoracic Surgery
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Boerhaave's syndrome represents 30-40% of esophageal disruptions.
- Management strategies and treatment outcomes for Boerhaave's syndrome remain controversial in current literature.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of different surgical approaches for Boerhaave's syndrome.
- To compare the efficacy of primary repair versus esophagectomy in managing esophageal disruptions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 14 patients with Boerhaave's syndrome treated between 1988 and 1998.
- Patients were divided into two groups: Group I (minor leak, local mediastinitis, hyperdynamic septic shock) treated with primary repair (5 cases), and Group II (moderate to severe leak, severe mediastinitis, hypodynamic septic shock) treated with transthoracic esophagectomy (9 cases).
Main Results:
- Group I (primary repair) had no postoperative mortality, with a mean ICU stay of 4.6 days and mean hospitalization of 14 days.
- Group II (esophagectomy) experienced a 22.2% postoperative mortality rate, with a mean ICU stay of 28 days and mean hospitalization of 45 days.
Conclusions:
- The choice of surgical intervention for Boerhaave's syndrome necessitates a thorough assessment of the patient's condition.
- Critical factors include the patient's overall status, the duration of the esophageal leak, and the degree of mediastinal and pleural contamination.