Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods employed for other systematic reviews.

A M Horowitz1, P F Anderson

  • 1National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6401, USA. alice.horowitz@nih.gov

Journal of Dental Education
|November 9, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Scoping Review of Women with Physical Disabilities and Cervical Cancer Screening.

Journal of women's health (2002)·2025
Same author

Married to medicine.

Annals of internal medicine·2013
Same author

Minimal Tuberculosis.

Journal of the National Medical Association·2010
Same author

Proceedings: 9th World Congress on Preventive Dentistry (WCPD): "Community Participation and Global Alliances for Lifelong Oral Health for All," Phuket, Thailand, September 7-10, 2009.

Advances in dental research·2010
Same author

A report on the NIH Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and Management of Dental Caries Throughout Life.

Journal of dental research·2004
Same author

Dental hygienists' knowledge, opinions, and practices related to oral and pharyngeal cancer risk assessment.

Journal of dental hygiene : JDH·2002
Same journal

Redefining Graduation Competency for Clinical Skills Assessment: A Conceptual Proposal Originating From Periodontal Education.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same journal

Entrustment and Practice Readiness: Learner Experiences With Implementing Longitudinal Assessment Using Entrustable Professional Activities.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same journal

Smile beyond Borders: Gender, Academic Level, and Contextual Cross-Cultural Smile Self-Perception among Preclinical and Clinical Dental Students.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same journal

Impact of AI-Generated Feedback on Dental Student Performance in Preclinical Prosthodontics Education.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same journal

An Exploratory Comparative Analysis of Mixed Reality Simulation Versus 3D-Printed Models for Undergraduate Training in Third Molar Removal.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same journal

Preparing for Evolving Roles: Variation in Dental Hygiene and Therapy Practice.

Journal of dental education·2026
See all related articles

Independent reviewers and the Research Triangle Institute/University of North Carolina team used different training and methods for the Diagnosis and Management of Dental Caries Throughout Life conference. This highlights variations in scientific review processes.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Science
  • Public Health
  • Evidence-Based Dentistry

Background:

  • The Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and Management of Dental Caries Throughout Life convened to establish guidelines.
  • Two distinct groups of reviewers were engaged in the conference process.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the methodologies employed by different reviewer groups in a consensus development conference.
  • To identify potential impacts of differing reviewer training and methods on conference outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Independent reviewers underwent specific training and utilized defined methodologies.
  • A separate team from the Research Triangle Institute and University of North Carolina (RTI/UNC) employed their own training and methods.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant differences were observed in the training protocols for the two reviewer groups.
  • Variations in the methodologies applied by the independent reviewers and the RTI/UNC team were documented.

Conclusions:

  • The divergence in reviewer training and methodology may influence the consensus-building process for dental caries diagnosis and management.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for interpreting the conference's findings and recommendations.