Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intergroup bias.

Miles Hewstone1, Mark Rubin, Hazel Willis

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, United Kingdom. miles.hewstone@psy.ox.ac.uk

Annual Review of Psychology
|December 26, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rethinking social media metrics: Daily interaction valence and well-being in university students.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

Pan-cancer immune and stromal deconvolution predicts clinical outcomes and mutation profiles.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The association between mass media news about interethnic contact and relations between ethnic minorities and natives: The perspective of African immigrants in Italy.

Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology·2024
Same author

Interdependent stigma of seeking mental health services: Examining a new scale across eight countries/regions.

Journal of counseling psychology·2024
Same author

How the size and structure of egocentric networks change during a life transition.

Advances in life course research·2024
Same author

Variety Is the Spice of Life: Diverse Social Networks Are Associated With Social Cohesion and Well-Being.

Psychological science·2024
Same journal

Implicit Bias: Evolution of a Powerful Idea.

Annual review of psychology·2026
Same journal

Introduction.

Annual review of psychology·2026
Same journal

Social Robotics Is Not (Just) About Machines, It Is About People: Psychology's Role in Developing Social Machines.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Intensive Longitudinal Methods: Toward a Psychological Science of Daily Life.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Human Rationality.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Space to Act, Think, and Create.

Annual review of psychology·2025
See all related articles

This review explores intergroup bias, focusing on in-group favoritism and out-group derogation. It examines theories, moderators, reduction strategies, and links to social hostility for future research.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Behavioral Sciences

Background:

  • Extensive literature exists on in-group favoritism and out-group derogation.
  • Understanding the nuances of intergroup bias is crucial for social cohesion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the literature on bias favoring in-groups over out-groups.
  • To identify key issues, theories, moderators, and reduction strategies.
  • To explore the link between intergroup bias and social hostility.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review synthesizing research on intergroup bias.
  • Analysis of measurement and conceptual issues in bias research.
  • Examination of modern theories and moderators of bias.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified key areas for future research in intergroup bias.
  • Highlighted motivational explanations and moderators influencing bias.
  • Discussed individual and intergroup approaches to bias reduction.

Conclusions:

  • Intergroup bias is a complex phenomenon influenced by various factors.
  • Further research is needed to refine measurement and understand reduction strategies.
  • Addressing intergroup bias is essential to mitigate social hostility.