Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Recommendations for a mammography quality assurance program.

A R Craig1, J C Heggie, I D McLean

  • 1Biomedical Technology Services, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, QLD. tony_craig@health.qld.gov.au

Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Position paper: recommendations for a digital mammography quality assurance program V4.0.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2017
Same author

Contact radiotherapy boost in association with 'watch and wait' for rectal cancer: initial experience and outcomes from a shared programme between a district general hospital network and a regional oncology centre.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2016
Same author

The application of thermoluminescence dosimetry in X-ray energy discrimination.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2015
Same author

Phase 2 study of subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant to or intolerant of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

American journal of hematology·2013
Same author

Criteria and suspension levels in diagnostic radiology.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
Same author

Suspension criteria for dual energy X ray absorptiometry.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
Same journal

A comparison between EPSON V700 and EPSON V800 scanners for film dosimetry.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

Nanodosimetric understanding to the dependence of the relationship between dose-averaged lineal energy on nanoscale and LET on ion species.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

Schizophrenia diagnosis using innovative EEG feature-level fusion schemes.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

Force decoding using local field potentials in primary motor cortex: PLS or Kalman filter regression?

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

EPSM 2019, Engineering and Physical Sciences in Medicine : 28-30 October 2019, Perth, Australia.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

New name: Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
See all related articles

This paper updates mammography quality assurance (QA) recommendations for medical physicists. It addresses technological advancements and accreditation programs, ensuring optimal mammography screening practices.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiology
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • The 1989 ACPSEM position paper provided initial guidance on mammography equipment QA.
  • Significant advancements in mammography technology necessitate a review of previous recommendations.
  • New accreditation programs, such as ACR-MAP and RANZCR-MAP, have emerged.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and update the Australian College of Physical Sciences in Medicine (ACPSEM) position on mammography quality assurance (QA).
  • To align QA recommendations with current mammography technology and accreditation standards.
  • To provide guidance for medical physicists in mammography QA.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the 1989 ACPSEM position paper.
  • Consideration of technological advancements in mammography.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of developments in mammography accreditation programs (ACR-MAP, RANZCR-MAP).
  • Deliberations by the Radiology Interest Group.

    • Main Results:

    • Identification of areas in the 1989 paper requiring revision due to technological progress.
    • Incorporation of standards from major accreditation bodies into QA recommendations.
    • Updated guidance on equipment testing and performance specifications for medical physicists.

    Conclusions:

    • The updated position paper reflects current best practices in mammography QA.
    • Medical physicists require revised guidelines to address modern mammography systems.
    • Adherence to updated QA protocols is crucial for effective mammography screening and accreditation.