Related Experiment Videos
Silzone coating and paravalvular leak: an independent, randomized study.
P Herijgers1, M C Herregods, A Vandeplas
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, UZ Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
The Journal of Heart Valve Disease
|January 5, 2002
Summary
This study found no significant difference in paravalvular leak between Silzone-coated and uncoated mechanical heart valves. The incidence of major paravalvular leaks was low in both groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a potential complication following mechanical heart valve replacement.
- Silzone coating was developed to potentially reduce thrombus formation and improve valve performance.
- Independent evaluation of Silzone-coated valves is crucial, separate from industry-sponsored trials like AVERT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of Silzone coating on paravalvular leak prevalence after mechanical valve replacement.
- To compare PVL rates between Silzone-coated and uncoated St. Jude Medical Masters valves in a randomized cohort.
- To evaluate plasma LDH levels as a marker of hemolysis or inflammation.
Main Methods:
- Randomized implantation of 95 patients with either Silzone-coated or uncoated St. Jude Medical Masters mechanical valves.
- Exclusion of patients with suspected or diagnosed infective endocarditis.
- Post-recall, control transthoracic echocardiography and plasma LDH determination were performed on surviving patients.
Main Results:
- No major paravalvular leaks were observed in either the Silzone-coated (5/51 minimal PVL) or uncoated (3/53 minimal/slight PVL) valve groups.
- The incidence of minimal paravalvular leak was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.55).
- Plasma LDH levels showed no significant difference between the Silzone and control groups (p = 0.10).
Conclusions:
- Silzone coating did not demonstrate a significant impact on the incidence of paravalvular leak in this patient cohort.
- The observed incidence of major PVL in this study was lower than reported in the AVERT trial.
- Further investigation may be warranted, but initial findings suggest comparable PVL rates between coated and uncoated valves.