Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence based dentistry: design architecture.

Catherine Hayes1

  • 1Department of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. catherine_hayes@hms.harvard.edu

Dental Clinics of North America
|January 12, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Projected Oral Health Outcomes and Costs Associated With Pediatric Medicaid Disenrollment.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Factors influencing use and choice of Core Outcome Sets and Outcome Measurement Instruments in trials of interventions to prevent childhood obesity: a mixed-methods survey.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025
Same author

Metabolic Syndrome and Dental Caries Among Adults in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015-2018.

Cureus·2025
Same author

A Scoping Review of Instruments Used to Measure Weight and Body Composition in Infants Under 1 Year.

Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity·2025
Same author

Use of implementation science frameworks to identify core components and sustainability characteristics of a quality improvement learning collaborative.

BMC health services research·2025
Same author

Insurance Dynamics During Childhood in the Fragmented US Health System.

JAMA·2025
Same journal

The Expanding Role of Virtual Surgical Planning in Maxillofacial Trauma Management.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Revision Surgery for Occlusal Correction in Facial Trauma.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Mandibular Condylar Fractures and Occlusal Management.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Occlusion Management in Facial Trauma: A Literature Review.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Dental Implants in Rehabilitation of Patients with Facial Trauma: a Review of Most Current Practices.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Dentoalveolar Fractures.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Clinicians must critically evaluate clinical studies, understanding their strengths and limitations. Consider chance, bias, and confounding; causality is based on the body of evidence, not single studies.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Clinical study design evaluation

Background:

  • Understanding different clinical study types is crucial for healthcare professionals.
  • Each study design possesses unique strengths and inherent limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the importance of critical appraisal of medical literature.
  • To highlight potential alternative explanations for study findings: chance, bias, and confounding.
  • To guide clinicians in interpreting research and drawing evidence-based conclusions.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of fundamental principles in evaluating research studies.
  • Explanation of common threats to study validity (chance, bias, confounding).

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Research findings must be critically assessed, not merely summarized.
  • Alternative explanations (chance, bias, confounding) require careful consideration.
  • Conclusions:

    • Causality cannot be inferred from a single study.
    • Conclusions regarding causality should be based on the totality of evidence.
    • Critical evaluation of study design and potential biases is essential for informed clinical practice.