Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Protocol for Recombinant RBD-based SARS Vaccines: Protein Preparation, Animal Vaccination and Neutralization Detection
Published on: May 2, 2011
Vaccines: World Health Organization versus Federal Drug Administration recommended formula
M K Khalil1, Y Y al-Mazrou, Y S al-Ghamdi
1King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Insights
Infant vaccines using FDA formulas showed higher antibody levels for tetanus and diphtheria compared to WHO formulas, despite lower antigen concentrations. Oral poliovirus vaccine immunogenicity remained comparable between the two vaccine formulations.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Vaccinology
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Vaccine formulations can differ significantly between global regulatory standards (WHO) and national standards (FDA).
- Understanding the immunogenicity of different vaccine concentrations is crucial for public health policy and vaccine efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the immunogenicity of vaccines prepared according to WHO and FDA formulas in infants.
- To assess antibody responses to Haemophilus influenzae type b, diphtheria, tetanus, and poliovirus antigens.
Main Methods:
- A randomized trial involving 6-week-old infants receiving three doses of vaccines (Haemophilus influenzae type b, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, oral polio) at specified intervals.
- Antibody levels (polyribosylribitol phosphate, tetanus, diphtheria, poliovirus) were measured one month post-vaccination.
Main Results:
- Infants receiving the FDA-formula vaccine exhibited significantly higher anti-tetanus and anti-diphtheria antibody levels compared to those receiving the WHO-formula vaccine.
- Despite having half the concentration of diphtheria and tetanus antigens, the FDA formula elicited a stronger response.
- No significant differences in immunogenicity were observed for the oral poliovirus vaccine between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- FDA-formulated vaccines demonstrate superior immunogenicity for diphtheria and tetanus antigens compared to WHO-formulated vaccines in infants.
- Vaccine formulation and antigen concentration play a critical role in eliciting robust immune responses.
- Further research may be warranted to optimize global vaccine formulations for enhanced pediatric immune protection.
Abstract:
Vaccines produced in accordance with WHO formulas, differ in concentration from those used in United States according to FDA formulas. We aimed to compare the immunogenicity of both formulas. Infants who were 6 weeks old were randomly put into 3 groups to receive 3 doses of vaccines at 6 weeks, 3 months and 5 months of age. The vaccines consisted of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and oral polio vaccine. Antibody levels for polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP), tetanus, diphtheria and poliovirus were measured 1 month after the third dose of vaccines. Although diphtheria and tetanus antigens in the FDA formula are half the concentration of the WHO formula, anti-tetanus and anti-diphtheria antibodies were significantly higher. No difference was found between groups regarding oral poliovirus vaccine.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Drug Regulation
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Vaccines

