Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Criticality of predictors in multiple regression.

R Azen1, D V Budescu, B Reiser

  • 1Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.

The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
|January 31, 2002
PubMed
Summary

A novel predictor criticality measure enhances multiple regression analysis by identifying key variables. This method uses bootstrapping to determine which predictors are crucial for the best-fitting models, improving predictive accuracy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Hemoptysis and acute kidney injury in COVID-19].

Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin·2020
Same author

Gold nanorods with conjugated polymer ligands: sintering-free conductive inks for printed electronics.

Chemical science·2018
Same author

Multivalent bonds in self-assembled bundles of ultrathin gold nanowires.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2016
Same author

A Note On Polynomial Regression.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Corrections For Spurious Influences On Correlations Between Mmpi Scales.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Microglial stability and repopulation in the retina.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2005

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Regression Analysis
  • Computational Statistics

Background:

  • Traditional methods for assessing predictor importance in multiple regression have limitations.
  • Existing indices may not fully capture a predictor's role in identifying the best-fitting model.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a new method for comparing predictors in multiple regression models.
  • To develop a measure of predictor criticality distinct from traditional importance indices.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes the bootstrapping (resampling with replacement) procedure to generate numerous data samples.
  • Fits all 2^p subset regression models for each sample and identifies the best subset model.
  • Defines predictor criticality based on the probabilities of subsets including that predictor being the best.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Generates the probability distribution for the best subset model across all possible subsets.
  • Quantifies predictor criticality as a function of probabilities associated with models containing the predictor.
  • Demonstrates the procedure's applicability to various regression models and goodness-of-fit measures.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed predictor criticality measure offers advantages over traditional importance indices.
  • Predictors included in a higher number of probable best-fitting models are identified as critical.
  • The method provides a robust approach for understanding predictor roles in multiple regression and enhancing predictive modeling.