Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Making trade-offs: a probabilistic and context-sensitive model of choice behavior.

Claudia González-Vallejo1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens 45701-2979, USA. gonzalez@oak.cats.ohiou.edu

Psychological Review
|February 28, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is low cost really conducive to primary care utilisation: An empirical analysis of community health centers in China.

Health & social care in the community·2021
Same author

Waiting in intertemporal choice tasks affects discounting and subjective time perception.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2020
Same author

How Much Sugar is in My Drink? The Power of Visual Cues.

Nutrients·2020
Same author

Unpacking decision difficulty: Testing action dynamics in Intertemporal, gamble, and consumer choices.

Acta psychologica·2018
Same author

Nutrient-specific system versus full fact panel: Testing the benefits of nutrient-specific front-of-package labels in a student sample.

Appetite·2018
Same author

Use of the familiarity difference cue in inferential judgments.

Memory & cognition·2017
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

Decision-making models explain choices using normalized attribute value differences. The proportional difference (PD) model effectively predicts choices and captures context-dependent sensitivity to these differences.

Area of Science:

  • Decision Science
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Mathematical Psychology

Background:

  • Decision-making models often simplify the complex process of evaluating attribute differences.
  • Understanding how individuals weigh attribute value differences is crucial for predicting choices.
  • Existing models may not fully capture context-dependent variations in decision sensitivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and test the stochastic difference model, specifically the proportional difference (PD) model.
  • To evaluate the PD model's ability to account for individual and group choice data.
  • To assess the model's capacity to describe violations of standard choice axioms.

Main Methods:

  • The study employs a stochastic difference model framework.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Choice probabilities are modeled as a function of a normalized difference variable (d) and a decision threshold (delta).
  • The proportional difference (PD) normalization was utilized and tested against nine diverse datasets.

    • Main Results:

    • The proportional difference (PD) model demonstrated strong explanatory power for both individual and group data.
    • The decision threshold (delta) effectively captured context-dependent sensitivity to attribute value differences.
    • The model successfully described observed violations of stochastic dominance, independence, and stochastic transitivity.

    Conclusions:

    • The stochastic difference model, particularly the PD variant, provides a robust framework for understanding decision-making.
    • The decision threshold parameter offers valuable insights into context effects on choice behavior.
    • The PD model's ability to account for choice axiom violations enhances its predictive and descriptive capabilities.