Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lateral interactions: size does matter.

Russell L Woods1, Alex K Nugent, Eli Peli

  • 1The Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, 20 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. rwoods@vision.eri.harvard.edu

Vision Research
|March 13, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A randomized crossover clinical trial of multi-periscopic and Fresnel peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same author

Home lighting, blue-light filtering, and their effects on melatonin suppression.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Risk of pedestrian collision for persons with peripheral field loss: A computational analysis: Erratum.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2025
Same author

Risk of pedestrian collision for persons with peripheral field loss: A computational analysis.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2024
Same author

Gaze Scanning on Mid-Block Sidewalks by Pedestrians With Homonymous Hemianopia With or Without Spatial Neglect.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2024
Same author

Pilot study of a pedestrian collision detection test for a multisite trial of field expansion devices for hemianopia.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2024
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Spatial scaling of flanker effects in contrast detection is not scale-invariant. Stimulus size and spatial frequency interact, influencing contrast thresholds and visual perception.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Image processing

Background:

  • Lateral masking and flanker effects influence contrast detection.
  • Previous studies suggested spatial scaling invariance for flanker effects.
  • Stimulus bandwidth was previously confounded with spatial frequency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate spatial scaling of flanker effects on contrast detection.
  • To clarify the relationship between stimulus size, spatial frequency, and flanker influence.
  • To reconcile findings with existing models of lateral interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Replication of original flanker effect studies.
  • Systematic variation of Gabor patch size (sigma) and spatial frequency (lambda).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Controlled manipulation of flanker contrast relative to detection threshold.

    • Main Results:

    • Flanker effects were not scale-invariant when Gabor size was fixed.
    • Facilitation varied with spatial frequency (2-13 cycles/deg) when size was constant.
    • Larger patch sizes and lower spatial frequencies typically caused inhibition.
    • Facilitation decreased with reduced flanker contrast, but was present with sub-threshold flankers.

    Conclusions:

    • Spatial scaling of flanker effects is not scale-invariant.
    • Both stimulus and flanker size (lambda and sigma) significantly impact contrast thresholds.
    • Current models of lateral interactions require revision to account for these findings.