Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of detrending methods for optimal fMRI preprocessing.

Jody Tanabe1, David Miller, Jason Tregellas

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA.

Neuroimage
|March 22, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Grant et al. Low pH, High Stakes: A Narrative Review Exploring the Acid-Sensing GPR65 Pathway as a Novel Approach in Renal Cell Carcinoma. <i>Cancers</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 3883.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Altered Hypothalamic functional connectivity in adolescents with severe obesity.

Research square·2026
Same author

Variations in Perinatal Interventions and Outcomes Among Active-Duty Service Women in the U.S. Military Health System.

Journal of women's health (2002)·2025
Same author

Anger-Related Affect and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association·2025
Same author

Low pH, High Stakes: A Narrative Review Exploring the Acid-Sensing GPR65 Pathway as a Novel Approach in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Cancers·2025
Same author

What Is the Cost Impact of Second Opinions in Oncology? A Retrospective Review.

JCO oncology practice·2025
Same journal

Segmentation of the parasagittal dura mater on multi-center 3D-FLAIR MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Spatial frequency channels implement a mental ruler in spatial vision.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Link Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Measured Brain Diffusivity During Wakefulness and Sleep Macrostructure in the Elderly.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Closed-loop adaptation of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity with electroencephalography feedback.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Volumetric postmortem MRI of the medial temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: methodological advances and implications for in vivo biomarker development.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neural responses to equity and inequity when receiving vicarious rewards for self and charity during adolescence.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Removing low-frequency signal drift in fMRI data is crucial for detecting weak brain activations. Auto-detrending, which selects the best algorithm for each voxel, appears most effective for improving fMRI analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data suffers from low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
  • Low-frequency signal intensity drift, caused by scanner noise and physiological pulsations, complicates the detection of weak brain activations.
  • There is no established consensus on optimal methods for removing this baseline drift.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of five voxel-based detrending techniques and an auto-detrending algorithm for fMRI data preprocessing.
  • To identify the most effective method for removing baseline drift to enhance the detection of brain activation.

Main Methods:

  • Five voxel-based detrending methods (linear, quadratic, cubic, wavelet, spline) were evaluated.

Related Experiment Videos

  • An auto-detrending algorithm was developed to automatically select the optimal detrending method per voxel.
  • Performance was assessed by the percentage of activated voxels at a significance level of P < 10(-6).

    • Main Results:

    • Linear and quadratic detrending moderately increased activated voxels.
    • Cubic detrending decreased activation; wavelet approach yielded variable results.
    • Spline detrending performed best as a single algorithm.
    • Auto-detrending demonstrated the most judicious approach by selecting the optimal method or no detrending.

    Conclusions:

    • Baseline drift removal is essential for fMRI analysis, especially for weak activations.
    • Auto-detrending offers a superior and adaptable strategy for optimizing fMRI preprocessing.
    • This approach enhances the reliability of detecting brain activity in challenging datasets.