Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing meta-analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions.

Piers D Steel1, John D Kammeyer-Mueller

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.

The Journal of Applied Psychology
|March 28, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the efficacy of psychological separation to address common method variance: Experimental evidence and a guiding research design framework.

The Journal of applied psychology·2025
Same author

Rookies connected: Interpersonal relationships among newcomers, newcomer adjustment processes, and socialization outcomes.

The Journal of applied psychology·2021
Same author

Job search and employment success: A quantitative review and future research agenda.

The Journal of applied psychology·2020
Same author

The comparative effects of supervisor helping motives on newcomer adjustment and socialization outcomes.

The Journal of applied psychology·2020
Same author

Extraversion advantages at work: A quantitative review and synthesis of the meta-analytic evidence.

The Journal of applied psychology·2019
Same author

Using machine learning to translate applicant work history into predictors of performance and turnover.

The Journal of applied psychology·2019
Same journal

Grateful leaders and attentive followers: How grateful attention transmits the cascade of gratitude expressions to strengthen coworker relationships.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Scoring employment interviews with large language models: Evaluation design components, validity investigations, and best practice recommendations.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A profile analysis of leader interpersonal emotion management strategies.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A choice architecture intervention to increase diversity: Diverse defaults can counteract hiring discrimination.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Transformational leadership in context: A meta-analysis of 40 years of research.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Organizations espousing an authenticity ideology repel stigmatized job seekers.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
See all related articles

Estimating moderator effects in meta-analysis is challenging. Weighted least squares (WLS) regression accurately assesses continuous moderators, unlike popular hierarchical subgroup (HS) analysis, especially with multicollinearity and heteroscedasticity.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Meta-analysis
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of moderating effects is crucial for robust meta-analysis.
  • Existing methods struggle with multicollinearity and heteroscedasticity in continuous moderator analysis.
  • Popular techniques like hierarchical subgroup analysis often yield inaccurate results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of different statistical methods for assessing continuous moderators in meta-analysis.
  • To evaluate methods under challenging conditions: multicollinearity and skewed sample size distributions (heteroscedasticity).
  • To identify the most reliable technique for moderator effect estimation in meta-analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Monte Carlo simulations were employed to compare statistical techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Methods assessed include bivariate correlations, ordinary least squares (OLS) multiple regression, weighted least squares (WLS) multiple regression, and hierarchical subgroup (HS) analysis.
  • Simulations focused on conditions with multicollinearity and heteroscedasticity.

    • Main Results:

    • Weighted least squares (WLS) regression demonstrated resilience to multicollinearity and heteroscedasticity.
    • Ordinary least squares (OLS) and bivariate correlations were significantly weakened by these conditions.
    • Hierarchical subgroup (HS) analysis, despite its popularity, yielded the most inaccurate moderator effect estimates.

    Conclusions:

    • Weighted least squares (WLS) is the most accurate and robust method for assessing continuous moderators in meta-analysis, even under adverse statistical conditions.
    • Researchers should reconsider the widespread use of hierarchical subgroup (HS) analysis due to its poor performance.
    • The findings advocate for the adoption of WLS in meta-analytic practice for improved moderator effect estimation.