Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Group learning improves case analysis in veterinary medicine.

John A Pickrell1, John Boyer, Frederick W Oehme

  • 1College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66505-5705, USA. pickrell@vet.ksu.edu

Journal of Veterinary Medical Education
|April 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

RE: Final Overall Survival: Fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the Randomized CONFIRM Trial.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2017
Same author

Commentary: Granulation for large postauricular defects.

Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]·2014
Same author

Historical evolution of medical quality assurance in the Department of Defense.

Military medicine·2010
Same author

Prostate-derived factor--a novel inhibitor of drug-induced cell death in colon cancer cells.

Molecular cancer therapeutics·2009
Same author

Conceptual framework for drought phenotyping during molecular breeding.

Trends in plant science·2009
Same author

Nanocrystalline titanium dioxide and magnesium oxide in vitro dermal absorption in human skin.

Cutaneous and ocular toxicology·2009
Same journal

Students' Short-Term Learning Processes in the Workplace and the Role of the Learning Environment: An Intensive Longitudinal Study.

Journal of veterinary medical education·2026
Same journal

Improving Inclusivity in the Curriculum via the Introduction of an Equine Industry-Specific Language eGlossary.

Journal of veterinary medical education·2026
Same journal

The Positive Impacts of Mentored Summer Research Programs on Veterinary Student Career Outcomes.

Journal of veterinary medical education·2026
Same journal

The Efficacy of eCBL Study Resources Compared to Traditional Study Strategies Used in a UK Veterinary Cohort.

Journal of veterinary medical education·2026
Same journal

Structured AI-Supported Assessment (SAISA): A Novel Design Integrating ChatGPT to Support Clinical Reasoning and Reflective Engagement in Veterinary Students.

Journal of veterinary medical education·2026
Same journal

Use of Reasonable Adjustments to Improve Accessibility in Veterinary OSCEs.

Journal of veterinary medical education·2026
See all related articles

Group learning enhances performance for health science students. Analyzing case-based evaluations in teams, rather than individually, led to an 8.5% performance advantage, indicating improved understanding and diagnostic skills.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Collaborative Learning
  • Health Professions

Background:

  • Group learning is increasingly vital for professional students in the healing sciences.
  • Collaborative learning facilitates the sharing of knowledge and procedural resources to improve performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if team-based analysis of case evaluations offers a performance advantage over individual analysis.
  • To assess if group work on one problem enhances individual performance on related problems.

Main Methods:

  • Students analyzed case-based evaluations individually and in teams.
  • Blinded written evaluations were used, with random assignment of numbers to groups.
  • Student's t-statistic and meta-analysis were employed to evaluate performance differences.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Group analysis yielded an 8.5% performance advantage compared to individual analysis.
  • Specific performance advantages for groups were observed in treatment (8.9%), differential diagnosis (5.9%), and prognosis (6.1%).
  • Prior group training provided a 1.5% performance advantage.

Conclusions:

  • Group analysis of evaluations suggests deeper student understanding, particularly in explaining treatment and differential diagnosis.
  • Enhanced collaborative learning improves diagnostic reasoning and knowledge application.
  • While group work boosts current performance, its effect on leveraging past experience for future tasks needs further investigation.